Re: background process "LGWR" did not start

2003-12-07 Thread Jared Still
ry segments > belong > > > > > > to which instance. Google for ipcs and oradebug, several helpful > > > > > > references > > > > > > showed up when I tried it. > > > > > > > > > > > > HTH > > > >

Re: background process "LGWR" did not start

2003-12-07 Thread Yechiel Adar
; > > > to which instance. Google for ipcs and oradebug, several helpful > > > > > references > > > > > showed up when I tried it. > > > > > > > > > > HTH > > > > > > > > > > Jared &g

Re: background process "LGWR" did not start

2003-12-06 Thread Jared Still
ral helpful > > > > references > > > > showed up when I tried it. > > > > > > > > HTH > > > > > > > > Jared > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > &

Re: background process "LGWR" did not start

2003-12-05 Thread Mladen Gogala
t; > HTH > > > > > > Jared > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Bellow, Bambi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > 12/05/2003 08:34 AM > > &g

Re: background process "LGWR" did not start

2003-12-05 Thread Jared Still
; > > Jared > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Bellow, Bambi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 12/05/2003 08:34 AM > > Please respond to ORACLE-L > > > > > > To: Mult

RE: background process "LGWR" did not start

2003-12-05 Thread Adams, Matthew (GECP, MABG, 088130)
also 'sysresv'  will show which shared memory segments and semaphore sets belong to an instance.   Matt Adams - GE Appliances - [EMAIL PROTECTED]Their fundamental design flaws are completelyhidden by their superficial design flaws.  - Douglas Adams   -Original Message

Re: background process "LGWR" did not start

2003-12-05 Thread Mladen Gogala
ORACLE-L > > > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc: > Subject:RE: background process "LGWR" did not start > > > Hi John! > > When I've run into this problem it was becau

RE: background process "LGWR" did not start

2003-12-05 Thread Jared . Still
      To:        Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>         cc:                 Subject:        RE: background process "LGWR" did not start Hi John! When I've run into this problem it was because there was a memory segment being forced open.  If you have t

RE: background process "LGWR" did not start

2003-12-05 Thread Bellow, Bambi
Hi John! When I've run into this problem it was because there was a memory segment being forced open. If you have the same issue, I can hep. First, assuming that you're on Unix (if you're not, please ignore the rest of this email and just have a lovely day), and that your database is down (other

RE: background process "LGWR" did not start

2003-12-05 Thread babette.turnerunderwood
Is it possible there are stuck memory segments (using ipcs -m when instance is shutdown) ?? Any other errors in alert log, etc ? - Babette -Original Message- Sent: 2003-12-04 9:34 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Anyone know what might be causing this error? Oracle 8.1.7 on

Re: background process "LGWR" did not start

2003-12-04 Thread rahul sharma
alert/trace files ? - Original Message - To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:34 PM > Anyone know what might be causing this error? Oracle 8.1.7 on Solaris. > > background process "LGWR" did not start > > > -- > Please