Re: Difference in Performance in two schemas in the same BD

2003-09-10 Thread Wolfgang Breitling
There could be many reasons why the CBO does not use an index and a NL join like the RBO. The predicate columns could have skewed data distribution in which case gathering histograms on those columns might help, even though you're using bind variables. The index(es) could have a rather high

RE: Difference in Performance in two schemas in the same BD

2003-09-10 Thread Ramon E. Estevez
Tks Wolfang I have read the paper. db_file_multiblock_read_countinteger 32 hash_area_size integer 4194304 sort_area_retained_size integer 1048576 sort_area_size integer 2097152 hash_multiblock_io_count

RE: Difference in Performance in two schemas in the same BD

2003-09-10 Thread Wolfgang Breitling
Those setting partially cancel each other out: the db_file_multiblock_read_count value of 32 causes the optimizer to assign a lower cost to full table scans and subsequently to hash joins. The setting of optimizer_index_cost_adj to 30 causes the optimizer to assign a lower cost to index