I couldn't even get 9iAS R2 running on it's own with 500M. Of course it
installs its own database so that doesn't help. My sympathies.
Mike
-Original Message-
Sent: 19 December 2002 16:50
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
My issue is with memory requirements... try running iAS
When you say footprint of 9i, my mind automatically
flashes to the opening credits of Monty Python's Flying
Circus, in which the Liberty Bell March is terminated with
a large foot squashing down (*splat*)...
I'm not sure what type of systems you're running, but I
haven't seen drives smaller than
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bob
Metelsky
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 13:49
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Footprint of 9i
All
I'm about to consider rolling out 9i here and I'm wondering
what type of
On Tru64 5.1
/oracle/app/oracle/product du -sk 9.2.0
4601900 9.2.0
There are multiple DBA's here that have a hand in this, so I don't know how
much fiddling with the Apache stuff has been done (probably not much). At
this time, there is only one 9.2 database on the box, and it is
experimental,
Nearly 4Gb on Solaris 2.8. Pretty much a full selection installed
John
-Original Message-
Sent: 19 December 2002 15:00
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
On Tru64 5.1
/oracle/app/oracle/product du -sk 9.2.0
4601900 9.2.0
There are multiple DBA's here that have a hand in this,
Oracle 9.2.0.1 on NT:
Demo files 80MB.
Starter databases - 300MB
Yechiel Adar
Mehish
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 5:09 PM
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
My issue is with memory requirements... try running iAS 9i R2 on 700M of
RAM, with a local db.
Ugh!
Pat.
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Oracle 9.2.0.1 on NT:
Demo files 80MB.
Starter databases - 300MB
Yechiel
I'm not sure what type of systems you're running, but I
haven't seen drives smaller than 18G much lately. Perhaps
its time to upgrade to a SAN anyway? :-) 1G isn't all that
much to ask (especially if your production systems are
running in ARCHIVELOG mode), but your comments prove that
