RE: RE: Google's architecture -- was Re: paging and google.com

2003-09-30 Thread Bob Metelsky
: Friday, September 26, 2003 12:55 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: Re: RE: Google's architecture -- was Re: paging and google.com I'm confused. Does Tom Kyte actually say that Google uses Oracle or is he talking of google-like behaviour in Oracle queries ? Hemant At 07:24 AM 26-09

Re: Google's architecture -- was Re: paging and google.com

2003-09-26 Thread rgaffuri
hmmm. must have read it wrong in the book. any idea how to get the 'estimated number of record returned? From: Hemant K Chitale [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2003/09/26 Fri AM 10:44:40 EDT To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Google's architecture -- was Re: paging

RE: Google's architecture -- was Re: paging and google.com

2003-09-26 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra
Title: RE: Google's architecture -- was Re: paging and google.com http://tinyurl.com/ordz HTH Raj Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com All Views expressed in this email are strictly personal. QOTD: Any

RE: Google's architecture -- was Re: paging and google.com

2003-09-26 Thread Hemant K Chitale
recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: Re: Google's architecture -- was Re: paging and google.com hmmm. must have read it wrong in the book. any idea how to get the 'estimated number of record returned? Hemant K Chitale Oracle 9i Database Administrator Certified Professional My personal web site

RE: Google's architecture -- was Re: paging and google.com

2003-09-26 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra
TED]] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 11:00 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: Re: Google's architecture -- was Re: paging and google.com hmmm. must have read it wrong in the book. any idea how to get the 'estimated number of record returned? Hemant K Chital

Re: RE: Google's architecture -- was Re: paging and google.com

2003-09-26 Thread rgaffuri
must have been google like behavior. i dont focus on every word. From: Hemant K Chitale [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2003/09/26 Fri PM 12:39:53 EDT To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Google's architecture -- was Re: paging and google.com I'm confused

RE: Google's architecture -- was Re: paging and google.com

2003-09-26 Thread Mladen Gogala
. QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having an opinion is an art ! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 11:00 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: Re: Google's architecture -- was Re: paging

RE: Google's architecture -- was Re: paging and google.com

2003-09-26 Thread Bellow, Bambi
den Gogala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 11:50 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE: Google's architecture -- was Re: paging and google.com Google like behavior in oracle queries? On top of real results you get "paid placement" entri

RE: RE: Google's architecture -- was Re: paging and google.com

2003-09-26 Thread Matthew Zito
PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 11:00 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: Re: Google's architecture -- was Re: paging and google.com hmmm. must have read it wrong in the book. any idea how to get the 'estimated number of record returned? Hemant K Chital

RE: Google's architecture -- was Re: paging and google.com

2003-09-26 Thread Richard Ji
ubject: Re: Google's architecture -- was Re: paging and google.com hmmm. must have read it wrong in the book. any idea how to get the 'estimated number of record returned? Hemant K ChitaleOracle 9i Database Administrator Certified ProfessionalMy persona