Re: Multiple addreses in tns

2003-07-10 Thread Rachel Carmichael
it's valid. if there is no response on the first port, Oracle tries the next etc etc etc. It's a means of failover or allowing for continuity of connections while doing maintenance on a listener or server --- Bob Metelsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is having multiple addresses valid for a tns

RE: Multiple addreses in tns

2003-07-10 Thread Jack van Zanen
I think this is used in Parallel server environments. I have seen something similar (maybe not exactly) so it could well be valid. My understanding is that it should be working it's way down the list or pick a random address depending on (not much experience with OPS/RAC) Jack -Original

RE: Multiple addreses in tns

2003-07-10 Thread Gogala, Mladen
Add FAILOVER=ON and it will check the next address if the previous one has failed. Alternatively, use SOURCE_ROUTE=ON and it will check every single one of them if the previous one fails. Mladen Gogala Oracle DBA Phone:(203) 459-6855 Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- Sent:

RE: Multiple addreses in tns

2003-07-10 Thread Bob Metelsky
Thanks Rachael Getting some more feedback on this What this appears to be is a cluster configuration with a middle ware capability ( like Oracle FailSafe) to fail a database over from one node to its backup. This would be the reason each IP is configured with two ports. That sounds

RE: Multiple addreses in tns

2003-07-10 Thread Wolfgang Breitling
Works for me. I just did a the test on Oracle 8.1.7. Here is the trace file. Note the nsopen: unable to open transport after trying to find host fleming. Then it goes on to try host altair which succeeds. One thing though. The host must not exist or be unreachable. If the host is reachable but

Re: Multiple addreses in tns

2003-07-10 Thread Thomas Day
Is he trying to do failover or load balancing? Bob Metelsky

RE: Multiple addreses in tns

2003-07-10 Thread Bob Metelsky
I don't know, thats what Im trying to figgure out. Non the less the connection works, It looked weird to me (on the first impression) I suppose I could ask, I was just wondering if this was an easily identifiable entry Thanks bob Is he trying to do failover or load balancing? --