RE: Notification when something changes in the DB

2001-09-05 Thread Mercadante, Thomas F
John, we are using ADO, VB and ASP pages for our application. all transactions are stateless, much the same way you are explaining your system. To ensure that an update can occur with a high degree of confidence that the record did not change, we do the following: Every database table has a

RE: Notification when something changes in the DB

2001-09-05 Thread Val_Gamerman/Victoria_Financial . VICTORIA_FINANCIAL
Thanks to everybody who replied. We already have a solution similar to this implemented (via triggers) which allows us to not re-query the databse before doing an update, since the fields we are interested in are spread across multiple tables, etc., etc. I also realize that there multiple ways

Re: Notification when something changes in the DB

2001-09-05 Thread Yosi Greenfield
I'm fairly certain Oracle Forms does this too. I've had to write some complex forms that worked on updateable views, and I had to re-write Forms' on-update and on-lock triggers myself. yosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not so weird, PeopleSoft does things in a similar manner. When a panel in

Re: Notification when something changes in the DB

2001-09-04 Thread Connor McDonald
Oracle Forms achieves this (under its optimistic locking mode) by: After selecting the data (for display), when an update is to occur it re-select's using the rowid for the row to be update and also checks if the columns are still the same values as the what it originally selected. If not, then

RE: Notification when something changes in the DB

2001-09-04 Thread John Lewis
For whatever reasons this solutions was found to be not sound by a 3rd party consulting company which reccommended Oracle native technology to perform this check. Hmm... a trigger seem native to me. Perhaps they meant auditing. -Original Message- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: