Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 6:05 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: OCFS bug3146671
>
>
> I guess, it provides more of management and
I guess, it provides more of management and backup simplicity.
Thanks
Mohammed Ahsanuddin
IT ERP Systems
Verizon Wireless
Work : 845 365 7203
Cell : 201 638 8610
Pager : 800 366 2337 pin : 16040
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 3:15 PM
To: Multiple recipients of
That is a very reasonable default. Why would you want to have the hassle of
file locking
and inter-node coordination for such a trivial thing like archiving redo
files? In a RAC
system, if one instance is unable to archive its logs, the other one will do
that instead.
There should be a table called
