Scott (and others),
I apologize, all I was given regarding this document was a hard copy and based on
confidentiality footers, I'm don't think I'm allowed to distribute it. However, if
you're on an EMC system now, I'd call or e-mail your EMC rep and ask for it. If it
works as well as
We have had I/O issues in the last few months on EMC disks that were
corrected by physically relocating filesystems. With no other changes we saw
response times cut in half by simply splitting the filesystems from busy
databases onto different physical devices within the SAN.
- Original
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 4:44 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
NetApp SAN?
My understanding of NetApps was that is strictly NAS: Network Attached
Storage.
Basically, JBOD with NIC.
SAN's offer quite a few more management and configuration options
SAN is fine as long as you keep track of what's mapping to what physical
disks. I for one don't believe the SAN vendors that say their caching takes
care of performance for you and you don't need to worry about where data is
stored physically. Place datafiles the same way you would for local
Amen! For several years we heard from EMC reps, don't worry about it, don't worry
about it, then recently we we're given a white paper from EMC on striping for Oracle.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/07/03 09:43AM
SAN is fine as long as you keep track of what's mapping to what physical
disks. I for one
Darrell,
Could I have a copy of that white paper if you still have it?
Thanks,
Scott
At 08:19 AM 3/7/03 -0800, you wrote:
Amen! For several years we heard from EMC reps, don't worry about it,
don't worry about it, then recently we we're given a white paper from EMC
on striping for Oracle.
I'm pretty sure I only recieved a hard copy (I'm not in the office to check), but they
publish a lot of pdf documents on their site. I'll see if I can locate it there and
send a URL.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/07/03 10:55AM
Darrell,
Could I have a copy of that white paper if you still have it?
That's great! Thanks a ton.
-Scott
At 10:44 AM 3/7/03 -0800, you wrote:
I'm pretty sure I only recieved a hard copy (I'm not in the office to
check), but they publish a lot of pdf documents on their site. I'll see
if I can locate it there and send a URL.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/07/03 10:55AM
We ran ORacle on NETapps... about a 100 Production Databases and I spent a
massive
amount (6months) of time verifying that Certain applications were not
hindered by the
Netapp SAN... There was alot of doubt buy everyone... but in the end it was
clear the
San preformed fine..and all the glitches
NetApp SAN?
My understanding of NetApps was that is strictly NAS: Network Attached
Storage.
Basically, JBOD with NIC.
SAN's offer quite a few more management and configuration options than
NAS.
Jared
Spears, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/07/2003 12:19 PM
Perhaps you'll enjoy James Morle's Sane SAN paper on www.OakTable.net -
if you haven't seen it already.
Best regards,
Mogens
Scott Stefick wrote:
Hello,
We are currently spec'ing out hardware for our new ERP system. It is
either going to be Peoplesoft or Oracle. We are also debating on
11 matches
Mail list logo
