RE: Oracle sites 1/30/2002 ?

2002-01-30 Thread Sherman, Paul R.
be broke. >From: "Jamadagni, Rajendra" >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L >Subject: RE: Oracle sites 1/30/2002 ? >Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 05:40:26 -0800 > >I jus

RE: Oracle sites 1/30/2002 ?

2002-01-30 Thread Shaibal Talukder
I have been trying since 8.00 AM Central standard time. No matter what ORACLE claim, it appears to be broke.   >From: "Jamadagni, Rajendra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >S

RE: Oracle sites 1/30/2002 ?

2002-01-30 Thread Jesse, Rich
Down for me, too... :( Maybe I should log an iTA...whoops... Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Jesse, Rich INET:

RE: Oracle sites 1/30/2002 ?

2002-01-30 Thread Farnsworth, Dave
not me -Original Message- Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 7:30 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Can anyone get to the oracle sites this morning? I've tried since 7:30 EST and haven't been able to get on. oracle.com technet.oracle.com metalink Hope this isn't the Unbreakab

RE: Oracle sites 1/30/2002 ?

2002-01-30 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra
I just got on 8:41EST. Raj __ Rajendra Jamadagni MIS, ESPN Inc. Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc. QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an o