Re: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-20 Thread Jonathan Lewis
PM Aan: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Onderwerp: Re: pga workarea and ora-04030 I think what you've demonstrated is that pl/sql tables are not limited by pga-aggregate target, and that a pl/sql table can grow until it has taken up all the available memory on your machine. I'd

Re: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-20 Thread Connor McDonald
on HPUX? Regards, Jeroen -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Jonathan Lewis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: Saturday, January 10, 2004 6:54 PM Aan: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Onderwerp: Re: pga workarea and ora-04030 I think what you've demonstrated

RE: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-12 Thread Jeroen van Sluisdam
specific memory usage with these setting and how should this be done on HPUX? Regards, Jeroen -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Jonathan Lewis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: Saturday, January 10, 2004 6:54 PM Aan: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Onderwerp: Re: pga workarea and ora

Re: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-10 Thread Jonathan Lewis
PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 6 januari 2004 16:49 Aan: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Onderwerp: Re: pga workarea and ora-04030 The workarea_policy stuff does not apply to things like pl/sql tables, only to tuneable memory. Given that you don't have the problem when you disable

Re: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-10 Thread Ryan
' || uitleg ); end; end; -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Jonathan Lewis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 6 januari 2004 16:49 Aan: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Onderwerp: Re: pga workarea and ora-04030 The workarea_policy stuff does not apply to things

Re: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-10 Thread Jonathan Lewis
In the UGA, I should think (which also means the SGA if you are running MTS). It can't be in the PGA (ignoring the fact that the UGA is in the PGA for non-MTS) or you couldn't have global pl/sql tables that persist across database calls. Regards Jonathan Lewis http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

Re: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-10 Thread Ryan
I have seen people bulk collect into pl/sql tables so much data that you cannot even connect to the server. So I'm assuming that ones the UGA fills up, Oracle will allocate whatever unused memory is left on the server for pl/sql tables? - Original Message - To: Multiple recipients of list

RE: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-10 Thread Bobak, Mark
. -Original Message- From: Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sat 1/10/2004 4:34 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Cc: Subject:Re: pga workarea and ora-04030 I have seen people bulk collect into pl/sql tables so much data that you cannot even connect to the server

Re: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-10 Thread Tim Gorman
PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 6 januari 2004 16:49 Aan: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Onderwerp: Re: pga workarea and ora-04030 The workarea_policy stuff does not apply to things like pl/sql tables, only to tuneable memory. Given that you don't have the problem when you disable p_a_t

RE: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-09 Thread Jeroen van Sluisdam
; -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Jonathan Lewis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 6 januari 2004 16:49 Aan: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Onderwerp: Re: pga workarea and ora-04030 The workarea_policy stuff does not apply to things like pl/sql tables, only to tuneable memory. Given

Re: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-06 Thread Jonathan Lewis
The workarea_policy stuff does not apply to things like pl/sql tables, only to tuneable memory. Given that you don't have the problem when you disable p_a_t and w_p, it may be that there is some buggy event occurring where the workarea_policy code is being infringed by an abuse of pga memory.

Re: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-06 Thread Tanel Poder
When I increase the pga_aggregate_target to 2Gb and the smm_max_size also the program fails around the following numbers from pgastat I'm not advocating fiddling with hidden parameters here, but there is one more parameter which limits PGA usage, it's _pga_max_size and defaults to 200M.

RE: PGA Size

2003-10-07 Thread Mudhalvan, Moovarkku
Title: Message Hi Syed Do you have Enterprise manager installed on your machine... What is the version. You can install Enterprise Version Client on your Desktop and connect your database so that you can see the PGA size and all. Let me know if u have doubt or difficulties

Re: PGA Size

2003-10-07 Thread ManojKr Jha
select * from v$process where addr in (select paddr from v$session where sid=''); With Regards, Manoj Kumar Jha A transcendentalist engaged in auspicious activities does not meet with

RE: PGA

2003-04-01 Thread Ganesh Raja
Get GAJA's Book .. Oracle 101 Perf. Tunning.. U will find a Lot there .. HTH Best Regards, Ganesh R DID : +65-6215-8413 HP : +65-9067-8474 -Original Message- C.S.Venkata Subramanian Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 2:04 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L where can one find the

Re: PGA

2003-04-01 Thread Richard Foote
- Original Message - To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 4:03 PM where can one find the other myths about oracle? Venkat -- A number of Oracle Press books ... Cheers Richard -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:

RE: PGA

2003-04-01 Thread Mark Leith
http://www.quest-pipelines.com/newsletter-v3/0302_F.htm (Gaja Krishna Vaidyanatha) www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/myths.html (Jonathan Lewis) http://www.orapub.com/cgi/genesis.cgi?p1=subp2=abs119 (Cary Milsap) -Original Message- Foote Sent: 01 April 2003 14:34 To: Multiple recipients of list

RE: PGA

2003-03-31 Thread SARKAR, Samir
Arvind, When u set the sort_area_size for a database, it will allocate that much memory PER USER for any sort operation being performed on the database. In practice, it means that if u allocate too high a value for the sort_area_size and multiple users are performing multiple sorts, the Unix

RE: PGA

2003-03-31 Thread Ganesh Raja
Your PGA directly Affects the Amt memory the OS has to shell out for Oracle Server Process so Increasing the Sort_Area_Size does not have immd effect but if your users are going to do a sort then your PGA can grow to a Maximum of Sort_Area_Size before being pulled down to the Temp Segments. Just

RE: PGA

2003-03-31 Thread Connor McDonald
Oracle Myth #1745 When u set the sort_area_size for a database, it will allocate that much memory PER USER for any sort operation being performed on the database --- SARKAR, Samir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Arvind, When u set the sort_area_size for a database, it will allocate that much

RE: PGA

2003-03-31 Thread SARKAR, Samir
So whats the reality, Connor ?? I thought it was the reverse which was the myth i.e. it is often misunderstood as the total memory available to the database user as a whole for sort operations.I believe the reality is that the sort area size is the size allocated by Oracle per user process

RE: PGA

2003-03-31 Thread Nelson, Allan
Hello Arvind, This is sort of an open ended question. In general this parameter controls how much memory is allocated on a per session basis for in memory sorts. Sorts that require more memory than this will sort on the disk with a performance penalty. If you have the memory you should stay

RE: PGA

2003-03-31 Thread Nelson, Allan
If it is a myth where do we find the truth? Allan -Original Message- Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 8:19 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Oracle Myth #1745 When u set the sort_area_size for a database, it will allocate that much memory PER USER for any sort operation being

RE: PGA

2003-03-31 Thread Jared . Still
:RE: PGA If it is a myth where do we find the truth? Allan -Original Message- Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 8:19 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Oracle Myth #1745 When u set the sort_area_size for a database, it will allocate that much memory PER USER for any sort

RE: PGA

2003-03-31 Thread Goulet, Dick
From the Manual: SORT_AREA_SIZE specifies in bytes the maximum amount of memory Oracle will use for a sort. Afterthe sort is complete, but before the rows are returned, Oracle releases memory down to the size specified by the SORT_AREA_RETAINED_SIZE parameter. After the

RE: PGA

2003-03-31 Thread Pete Sharman
IIRC, even this release down to S_A_R_S stuff was a myth in earlier releases. The MALLOC call never really returned the memory to the OS. Of course, I don't have any earlier releases to prove it now! :) Pete Controlling developers is like herding cats. Kevin Loney, Oracle DBA Handbook Oh no,

RE: PGA

2003-03-31 Thread Goulet, Dick
Pate, Controlling duhvelopers is not like herding cats, it's more like giving them a bath!! Heavy body armor required! Dick Goulet -Original Message- Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 2:29 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L IIRC, even this release down to S_A_R_S stuff

RE: PGA

2003-03-31 Thread Pete Sharman
Did you ever see the EDS commercial on herding cats? Damn, it was funny! I still have it on my laptop, but I won't send it to the list (over 1 Mb is a bit much to send). Pete Controlling developers is like herding cats. Kevin Loney, Oracle DBA Handbook Oh no, it's not. It's much harder than

RE: PGA

2003-03-31 Thread Gogala, Mladen
S_A_R_S stuff? Please, be careful with those abbreviations. -Original Message- Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 2:29 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L IIRC, even this release down to S_A_R_S stuff was a myth in earlier releases. The MALLOC call never really returned the

RE: PGA

2003-03-31 Thread Goulet, Dick
Pete, Then send it privately: [EMAIL PROTECTED] No I have not seen it, but I still believe it's more like giving a cat a bath. Dick Goulet -Original Message- Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 3:44 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Did you ever see the EDS commercial on

RE: PGA

2003-03-31 Thread C.S.Venkata Subramanian
where can one find the other myths about oracle? Venkat -- On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 06:18:35 Connor McDonald wrote: Oracle Myth #1745 When u set the sort_area_size for a database, it will allocate that much memory PER USER for any sort operation being performed on the database --- SARKAR,

Re: PGA question

2003-02-27 Thread Connor McDonald
Presumably they affect some of the required memory structures - shouldn't be too hard to work out I would have thought. Just measure the pga usage via sesstat and play with the parameters to see the impact hth connor --- Koivu, Lisa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -