Title: RE: Physical Design Question
Exactly,
We had that Windows Server monitoring database on a w2K box, and due to performance issues, the monitoring app used to put so much load on the boxes it was supposed to monitor that we had to crash the boxes in out test lab.
So, we (DBA and Unix
PROTECTED]
Sent by: cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Physical
Title: RE: Physical Design Question
We have one Oracle home for all of our non-11i backend instances and one each for each of them (more for the extproc's that Dick was talking about and for ease of testing upgrades than for any other pressing reason.)
Auditors are a funny breed... they want
]
Com
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
by:
cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE:
Physical Design
Question
.com
07/17/2003
05:14
PM
Please respond
to
ORACLE-L
Well, since nobody else has jumped on
this...-Original Message- Here's my situation:
1. Should I use
Maybe ... Install Oracle in one directory tree; create soft links to it
(although soft links, like GUIs, are inherently evil). Then show the
auditors that the oracle home for each is different.
That way you don't have to try to explain that the oracle_home points to the
Oracle software which is
The hosting company we use does it that way so when we upgrade we
only have to change the soft link. No forgetting to edit a script!
--- Stephen Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe ... Install Oracle in one directory tree; create soft links to
it
(although soft links, like GUIs, are
-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: Physical Design Question
I do the same. One OH for each version. Listener uses the latest OH.
Databases set env script for OH required. Simple and it works.
I couldn't imagine having 14 OH's for 14 8i databases on one server :).
Now
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: Physical Design Question
I do the same. One OH for each version. Listener uses the latest OH.
Databases set env script for OH required. Simple and it works.
I
:
Subject:RE: Physical Design Question
I do the same. One OH for each version. Listener uses the latest OH.
Databases set env script for OH required. Simple and it works.
I couldn't imagine having 14 OH's for 14 8i databases on one server :).
Now if I were running on Windows then I
Title: RE: Physical Design Question
Tom,
for your amusement ... we have a software that keeps a tab on all the 2K servers we have and stores and monitors performance related information in its database. Works absolutely fine, but it is most stable when the database is on Oracle on Unix
:
Subject:RE: Physical Design Question
Tom,
for your amusement ... we have a software that keeps a tab on all the 2K
servers we have and stores and monitors performance related information in
its database. Works absolutely fine, but it is most stable when the
database
Title: Physical Design Question
David,
You
don't say but, I am assuming that all your databases are at the same Oracle
Release level. If this is the case, I would create one Oracle home for now
- you can always create a new Oracle Home when you start considering migrating
each individual
Title: Physical Design Question
Thomas,
Thanks
for the comments. The databases are all different versions (8.1.7.3 to
9.2.0.2.0), at least for the time-being.
In
your suggestion to use 1 Oracle Home for multiple databases, then maybe later
split into multiple Oracle Homes, do you have to
Well, since nobody else has jumped on this...
-Original Message-
Here's my situation:
1. Should I use a separate Oracle Home for each DB?
Not unless you have some peculiar situation there. Use separate ORACLE_HOME
for each version of Oracle but not each database.
Pros: --Allows
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Physical Design Question
.com
15 matches
Mail list logo
