ORACLE-L
Subject:RE: RE: Difference Between DBMS/RDBMS
No there was never a 6.1 or a 6.2 unless I missed a meeting.
The latest version of 6 I worked on was 6.0.37.
Regards,
Mike Hately
-Original Message-
Sent: 25 June 2002 18:09
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
There
I was quite upset myself. It's like he just doesn't care any more.
You were a VMS bloke at one point; Didn't you use 6.1?
=)
Mike
-Original Message-
Sent: 26 June 2002 12:14
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Didn't Larry call you direct to let you know Mike?. Very inconsider
Didn't Larry call you direct to let you know Mike?. Very inconsiderate of
him
-Original Message-
Sent: 26 June 2002 11:44
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Live and learn =)
I wasn't using VMS at the time but all the same, I'm surprised I haven't
heard about it.
Many thanks,
Mik
>The surest way to instantly become a millionaire in
>today's climate is to
>take your next pay cheque and go to beautiful Italy
>(convert to Lire),
>though the experience may be short-lived.
>
In fact, since last January, Italy uses Euro ... and on the current trend it may not
be long before a
Live and learn =)
I wasn't using VMS at the time but all the same, I'm surprised I haven't
heard about it.
Many thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
Sent: 26 June 2002 11:18
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
In fact, there was a 6.1. Lasted only
less than a year. It was one of the
In fact, there was a 6.1. Lasted only
less than a year. It was one of the
very early Parallel Server versions
available. Only ran on VMS, IIRC.
At least, that's the only port of it
I managed to install.
Cheers
Nuno Souto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
> No there was never
No there was never a 6.1 or a 6.2 unless I missed a meeting.
The latest version of 6 I worked on was 6.0.37.
Regards,
Mike Hately
-Original Message-
Sent: 25 June 2002 18:09
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
There was a 6.1 and/or 6.2? I went from 6.0.36 straight to 7.2.
Dick
RACLE-L
> Subject: RE: RE: Difference Between DBMS/RDBMS
>
>
>
> 3K of RAM available on the VIC-20. The other 5K were taken up by the
> operating system. I had a terminal emulator program that
> allowed me to
> dial-up at 300 baud and run an IBM mainframe from home. Re
Well, I've found old benchmark from 01/1984 :-)
http://www.gondolin.org.uk/hchof/reviews/text/yc-atari800xl.html
JP
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 17:58, you wrote:
> I've used Atari 800XL (still have it).
>
> JP
>
> On Tuesday 25 June 2002 17:13, you wrote:
> > Erm, programmed at college on something
"When the incompetent secretaries got mad about being replaced with
computers, and their
union got pissy about same, he fired them."
this explains a lot! take no prisoners! bargain with no-one! :)
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 12:24 PM
To: Multiple recipients of li
3K of RAM available on the VIC-20. The other 5K were taken up by the
operating system. I had a terminal emulator program that allowed me to
dial-up at 300 baud and run an IBM mainframe from home. Real bleeding-edge
stuff at the time (LOL).
AFAIK, "RDB" was DEC's Relational offering and was only available on VAXen,
and eventually Alphas. It was preceeded by DEC's CODASYL DBMS, known
generically as "DBMS". Perhaps IBM had an "RDB", too, since the names are
generic enough.
I worked extensively with DEC's DBMS and COBOL in my first p
My Z-80 based PC had 64K (useful only 48). That was the standard
architecture for Z80 4.77MHz 8-)
--
Alexandre
- Original Message -
To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 5:13 PM
> Erm, programmed at college on something called a Sinc
Hello,
I would have to look at my (very dusty) notes to check on the system
attributes and other particulars, but I recall using a system called RAX
(relational something something), running on a IBM mainframe (OS/MVS ?), in
1964, at the Univ. of R.I. The execute command was /end run. I can not
Heh, I started programming in PL/1 with DL/1 databases.
All hierarchical and you had to navigate round the tree using calls like
"GN" (get next) and "GU" (get unique). Oh the memories!
Regards,
Mike Hately
__Reply Separator
> Author: "Mercadante; Thomas F" <[E
I've used Atari 800XL (still have it).
JP
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 17:13, you wrote:
> Erm, programmed at college on something called a Sinclair ZX80 Spectrum 1K
> ram !!
>
>
> -Original Message-
> Sent: 25 June 2002 15:58
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
>
>
> Tom,
>
>
Erm, programmed at college on something called a Sinclair ZX80 Spectrum 1K
ram !!
-Original Message-
Sent: 25 June 2002 15:58
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Tom,
As I recall DB2 on a PC came about way back in the dark days of the 8080
processor and DOS (no version) s
17 matches
Mail list logo
