Re: Re: Nature of Oracle-l has changed

2003-08-27 Thread rgaffuri
used it. Its just something you have to live with. We dont make the rules. From: Tanel Poder [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2003/08/27 Wed AM 04:14:30 EDT To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Nature of Oracle-l has changed The other problem is the HR

Re: Re: Nature of Oracle-l has changed

2003-08-27 Thread Nuno Souto
Hey, all you gotta do is tell them 5 years. Like, it makes a difference to what they know of it? Cheers Nuno Souto [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:59 PM in the technical business. Who

RE: RE: Nature of Oracle-l has changed

2003-08-22 Thread Stephane Faroult
Mladen, There is another thing happening: companies are more and more relying on canned, off the shelf applications, in a hope to become compliant with present standards. That has dramatically cut down the number of needed developers, because if you don't have to develop your general ledger,

RE: RE: Nature of Oracle-l has changed

2003-08-22 Thread Goulet, Dick
There is another problem with canned applications. The damanagement has to make a choice to either bend the business to match the application of bend the application to match the business. From my point of view, the latter is happening more than the former. Also, as a side note, I

RE: RE: Nature of Oracle-l has changed

2003-08-22 Thread Karniotis, Stephen
Well, I wanted to add my .2 Cents here. Custom development projects have shrunk over the past year because companies are tired of the maintenance issues associated with custom applications. More organizations are shifting their efforts towards implementing canned solutions and taking the bite, as