with
these configurations to be efficient.
Regards,
Denmark Weatherburne
Belize
From: Berj Kacherian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LazyDBA.com Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RE: RAID or NOT to RAID?
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 10:19:26 -0700
You've got the right idea. RAID 1+0 is the best that you can use, but also
with
these configurations to be efficient.
Regards,
Denmark Weatherburne
Belize
From: Berj Kacherian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LazyDBA.com Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RE: RAID or NOT to RAID?
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 10:19:26 -0700
You've got the right idea. RAID 1+0 is the best that you can use, but also
are dealing
with them on the NT 4.0 platform?
Thanks in advance for your time.
Regards,
Knowledge is power, but it is only useful if it is shared!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LazyDBA.com Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RAID or NOT to RAID?
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 13:22:48 -0400
Can you
Administrador AIX
Compañía Cervecera de Nicaragua
-Mensaje original-
De: Denmark Weatherburne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: Miércoles, 08 de Agosto de 2001 12:48 p.m.
Para: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Asunto: Fwd: RE: RAID or NOT to RAID?
Hi DBA's,
I hope I'm
for your time.
Regards,
Knowledge is power, but it is only useful if it is shared!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LazyDBA.com Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RAID or NOT to RAID?
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 13:22:48 -0400
Can you forward me the info. you received on this? I am wondering
about
