Re: RE: Tablespace management.

2003-05-31 Thread rgaffuri
i read some oracle documentation that recommends you keep the number of extents below 1024. do you feel that this is inaccurate in an LMT? What if Im stuck with dictionary tablespacse and am not allowed to change? Does it matter? I do keep all my extents uniform. I thought there were issuse

Re: RE: Tablespace management.

2003-05-31 Thread Wolfgang Breitling
What Oracle documentation would that be? At 09:39 AM 5/30/2003 -0800, you wrote: i read some oracle documentation that recommends you keep the number of extents below 1024. do you feel that this is inaccurate in an LMT? What if Im stuck with dictionary tablespacse and am not allowed to change?

RE: RE: Tablespace management.

2003-05-31 Thread Jesse, Rich
: Friday, May 30, 2003 1:15 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: Re: RE: Tablespace management. What Oracle documentation would that be? At 09:39 AM 5/30/2003 -0800, you wrote: i read some oracle documentation that recommends you keep the number of extents below 1024. do

RE: RE: Tablespace management.

2003-05-31 Thread Wolfgang Breitling
To quote the paper: Oracle supports an unlimited number of extents in a segment. The performance for DML operations is largely independent of the number of extents in the segment. However, certain DDL operations such as dropping and truncating of segments are sensitive to the number of extents.

RE: RE: Tablespace management.

2003-05-31 Thread Jesse, Rich
-Original Message- From: Wolfgang Breitling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 4:00 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: RE: Tablespace management. To quote the paper: Oracle supports an unlimited number of extents in a segment. The performance