Re: RE: buffer overflow

2003-08-27 Thread Tanel Poder
Hi! If it does, and the proc if wrapped, you could also hack around by putting a trigger on some table which gets updated/inserted/deleted few times during the proc and put dbms_output.disable in it. I've never tried it myself, but it could work as well... Tanel. - Original Message -

Re: RE: buffer overflow

2003-08-26 Thread rgaffuri
talk about unprofessional... this stuff should never go into production. which vendor is it? ill aviod? cant you juse set serveroutput off? to turn off the output? From: Kevin Toepke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2003/08/26 Tue PM 01:44:42 EDT To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL

RE: RE: buffer overflow

2003-08-26 Thread Kevin Toepke
Forgot the smiley! And, to make up for that, I ran a simple test and found that 'set serveroutput off' solves the problem. My code: BEGIN dbms_output.put_line('sysdate: ' || sysdate); END; / with serveroutput on started dumping data to the screen in about 5 seconds. With serveroutput off I

Re: RE: buffer overflow

2003-08-26 Thread AK
looks like internally from proc its setting dbms_output.enable(); -ak - Original Message - To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 11:04 AM talk about unprofessional... this stuff should never go into production. which vendor is it?