I think with LMT's now, it is irrelevant. I still think you need to know
approx. how big the table is going to be, and place it in the correct LMT.
By this I mean that you may have different LMT's with different uniform
extent sizes. A very large table should be placed in the largest LMT
tablespa
ok, so should the number of extents in a table be considered in table design? there
are alot of .pdfs and people on this listserv that say it is irrelevant?
>
> From: Rachel Carmichael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2003/06/20 Fri PM 02:44:52 EDT
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PR
i understand, but alot of people have posted here that its ok to have smaller extents
anyway.
who is correct? or am i missing something?
>
> From: "Richard Ji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2003/06/20 Fri PM 02:00:11 EDT
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: R
