Re: SMJ, NL or HJ

2002-05-06 Thread Rajesh . Rao
] mon.co.uk cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: SMJ, NL or HJ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: SMJ, NL or HJ

2002-05-04 Thread Jonathan Lewis
Notes inline. Jonathan Lewis http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk Author of: Practical Oracle 8i: Building Efficient Databases Next Seminar - Australia - July/August http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html Host to The Co-Operative Oracle Users' FAQ http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html

RE: SMJ, NL or HJ

2002-05-03 Thread Stephane Faroult
Depends. The number of rows matching a given FK may vary widely. Collect stats, and let the CBO decide, it should not have it too wrong in such a case. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri, 03 May 2002 08:13:27

Re: SMJ, NL or HJ

2002-05-03 Thread Tim Gorman
Consider analyzing the EMPNUM column for each table as well, to provide the CBO with possibly crucial data distribution information... - Original Message - To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:18 AM Depends. The number of rows

RE: SMJ, NL or HJ

2002-05-03 Thread Rajesh . Rao
: ecorp.com Subject: RE: SMJ, NL or HJ Sent

Re: SMJ, NL or HJ

2002-05-03 Thread Jonathan Lewis
Since table B and C are using the same column to join to table A, then it should be possible to ensure that Oracle hashes tables B and C at the same time, then scans table A passing rows through each hash in turn. (The order can be permuted as necessary). If you can set the hash area size to

Re: SMJ, NL or HJ

2002-05-03 Thread Rajesh . Rao
PROTECTED] mon.co.uk cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: SMJ, NL or HJ [EMAIL