The buildings had no inner columns to support the structure, it was all on
the *outside* of the building, hence the reason it could be brought down so
easily.
K.
-Original Message-
Sent: 11 September 2001 19:40
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
I hardly believe the crashes took
I think the first thing we need to do after we rescue who we can from the
towers is build it back up as fast as possible, those two buildings are the
countries testicles. (pardon my description). They would not have been
targets if they were anything but.
Do not criticize someone until you
of an acordion effect.
Rodd
Original Message
On 9/11/01, 1:40:22 PM, Christopher Spence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
regarding RE: Sad News - Jets crashed into World Trade Center:
I hardly believe the crashes took the buildings down, I think there were
bombs placed that later fired to bring
-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Sad News - Jets crashed into World Trade Center
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:30:27 -0800
I think the first thing we need to do after we rescue who we can from the
towers is build it back up as fast as possible, those
Judging from the video. The building started collapsing from the top first, not the
bottom.
Richard Ji
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/11/01 14:01 PM
I hardly believe the crashes took the buildings down, I think there were
bombs placed that later fired to bring it down.
I hardly doubt crashest that
Title: OT: RE: Sad News - Jets crashed into World Trade Center
Here is what the Los Angeles Times had to say on the subject. Short version - not bombs, but burning jet fuel caused the buildings to collapse.
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-73606sep12.story?coll=la
:
mail.comSubject: RE: Sad News - Jets crashed into
World Trade Center
Sent by:
root@fatcity
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Spence [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 8:30 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Sad News - Jets crashed into World Trade Center
I think the first thing we need to do after we rescue who we can
At 12:45 PM 9/12/2001, Rachel Carmichael wrote:
No. building them back makes it all business as usual, let's forget
turn the area into a memorial, turn it into a place that helps people
(hospital, park, counseling center, daycare center). turn it into
something that shows hope
i've been
]
Subject: RE: Sad News - Jets crashed into World Trade Center
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:30:27 -0800
I think the first thing we need to do after we rescue who we can from the
towers is build it back up as fast as possible, those two buildings are the
countries testicles. (pardon my description
recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Sad News - Jets crashed into World Trade Center
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 09:05:22 -0800
those two buildings are the countries testicles. (pardon my
description).
Too darn difficult to pardon such analogy or sense of humor or whatever
ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Sad News - Jets crashed into World Trade Center
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:30:27 -0800
I think the first thing we need to do after we rescue who we can from the
towers is build it back up as fast as possible, those two buildings are the
countries testicles
Small... 1 DC-3 and one Boeing 767.
Pat.
-Original Message-
From: Jamadagni, Rajendra [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:15 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Sad News - Jets crashed into World Trade Center
Did anyone see this?
Not small jets by all accounts, 737 and 767big enough to bring them both
crashing down... :(
-Original Message-
Sent: 11 September 2001 15:15
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Did anyone see this?
2 small jets crashed into World Trade Center in NY shortly before 9am.
I
I hardly believe the crashes took the buildings down, I think there were
bombs placed that later fired to bring it down.
I hardly doubt crashest that high on the building will cause it to crash
down to the base, but we should soon hear.
Do not criticize someone until you walked a mile in their
Actually, if you think about it it is very possible. Once the
infrastructure where the impact occured was comprimised, the entire weight
of the thirty or so floors above it would have about 10 feet to accelerate
before it hit the rest of the structure. Personally, I don't believe it
would hit
Original Message
On 9/11/01, 1:40:22 PM, Christopher Spence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
regarding RE: Sad News - Jets crashed into World Trade Center:
I hardly believe the crashes took the buildings down, I think there were
bombs placed that later fired to bring it down.
I hardly doubt crashest
]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sad News - Jets crashed into World Trade Center
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 18:50:20 -0800
Actually, if you think about it it is very possible. Once the
infrastructure where the impact occured was comprimised, the entire weight
at the top. The
rest of it just collapsed on a floor by floor basis (accumulated weight
and force of the upper floors coming down). Sort of an acordion effect.
Rodd
Original Message
On 9/11/01, 1:40:22 PM, Christopher Spence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
regarding RE: Sad News - Jets crashed
19 matches
Mail list logo
