T.
T¬-Original
Message-From: Yechiel Adar
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: 25 August 2003 09:10To:
Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: Re: SharePlex
info
Sorry about the late reply but (if I remember
correctly from my research about one year ago) Shareplex does something like
ginal Message-From: Gorbounov,Vadim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, August 21,
2003 5:01 PMTo: Aponte, TonySubject: RE: SharePlex
info
Tony,
My
question was inspired by belief that SharePlex does log mining on the source
DB and hence do not
nte, Tony
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 5:44
PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE:
SharePlex info
Your
bandwidth requirements will be the rate of changes to the actual data.
The traffic consists of the actual data and control i
t ORACLE-L
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:14
AM
Subject: RE: SharePlex info
Yes. A nice neat trick indeed. Has anyone tried this?
About your redo generation : 5MB/sec -> 18000 MB/hour ==
18GB
IT is indeed huge. IS this peak or average? Good luck.
"Gorbounov,Vadim&
is case whole redo steam must be passed over the network anyway. 5 MB/sec over WAN. So we'are doing research if we could same some bandwidth.
Vadim
-Original Message-From: Tanel Poder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 5:14 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE
th it..
Tanel.
- Original Message -
From:
Gorbounov,Vadim
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 12:54
AM
Subject: RE: SharePlex info
Tanel,
That's nice trick, thanks a lot.
In
this case whole redo steam must be pas
But you would be wanting to transfer *full*
logfiles away from your production servers anyway at least if your data is
worth something...
Tanel.
1) You would need less network bandwidth with shareplex than
you would for transporting archive logs. about 1/3 rd of what you
ECTED]Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 5:14
PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: Re:
SharePlex info
Hi!
Btw, you can physically replicate 50% of your
tables with regular standby mechanisms as well. You just take the files
belonging to non-needed tablespaces offline a
Title: Message
Your
bandwidth requirements will be the rate of changes to the actual data. The
traffic consists of the actual data and control information needed to reassemble
the transaction on the target. The source database's other redo payload
(i.e., index operations, rollback segment
Thank
you, Raju. Very helpful
-Original Message-From: raju pa
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 4:59
PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: Re:
SharePlex info
1) You would need less network bandwidth with shareplex than
you would for
Title: Message
Hi!
Btw, you can physically replicate 50% of your
tables with regular standby mechanisms as well. You just take the files
belonging to non-needed tablespaces offline and standby recovers only the
required part. You just have to arrange your tables to right tablespaces and
sp
1) You would need less network bandwidth with shareplex than you would for transporting archive logs. about 1/3 rd of what you would need for physical stdby.
2) CPU burden would be 'little' I guess.
3) Shareplex replication allows you to have the table available for read on the target. (even up
12 matches
Mail list logo
