-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:RE: Slow SQL*Plus connect.
How big is the listener log file?? do you truncate/rename it on regular
basis??
just a thought.
Sunil Nookala
Dell Corp.
-Original Message
, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:RE: Slow SQL*Plus connect.
How big is the listener log file?? do you truncate/rename it on regular
basis??
just a thought.
Sunil Nookala
Dell Corp.
-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 4:09 AM
: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:RE: Slow SQL*Plus connect.
How big is the listener log file?? do you truncate/rename it on regular
basis??
just a thought.
Sunil Nookala
Dell Corp.
-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, January 22
If the box is swapping memory, connections can be slow since memory has to
allocated for the connection. Just one possibility.
-Original Message-
We have experienced a *very* slow connect time to a 9.0.1 database via
SQL*Plus (and other apps as well) on a Win2K machine,
--
Please
How big is the listener log file?? do you truncate/rename it on regular
basis??
just a thought.
Sunil Nookala
Dell Corp.
-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 4:09 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hi All,
We have experienced a *very* slow connect time to a
Is otrace enabled?
Note: 1020763.6
Note: 45482.1
Tim
-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 5:09 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hi All,
We have experienced a *very* slow connect time to a 9.0.1 database via
SQL*Plus (and other apps as well) on a Win2K
Suhen,
Look at what you are doing :
Query Plan
select orgplvee.org_lvl_parent
,prdplvee.prd_lvl_parent ,
(NVL(invbalee.on_hand_qty,0)+NVL(to_intrn_qty,0)),
(NVL(invbalee.on_hand_retl,0)+NVL(to_intrn_retl,0)),
(NVL(invbalee.on_hand_cost,0)+NVL(to_intrn_cost,0))
from
invbalee ,orgplvee
Hi Roland,
I would suggest that it pretty much depends on the number of rows that are
being returned from your select statement as well as the way the select
statement has been put together.
Try cutting the select statement from the insert and running it against an
explain plan to determine
Hi,
it must be doing full table scan.check your column positions of the
indexes in table user_ind_columns and change your where condition according
to the column positions.
rukmini
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August
Statistics can in fact hurt. If your queries are tuned for rule based
optimizer, it is very possible that cost base will perform suboptimal,
perhaps a little, perhaps a lot. You may need to tune the database to be
more efficient for CBO by changing parameters.
Although adding statistics and
10 matches
Mail list logo