RE: System Tablespace and Autoextend

2002-11-13 Thread Miller, Jay
Actually, SYSTEM is one of the only tablespaces I like to have it set on. While I originally set it to autoextend when I was doing an upgrade I left it active on the grounds that while I know how to recover if by some chance one of my datafiles runs out of space, I'm uncertain as to the

RE: System Tablespace and Autoextend

2002-11-07 Thread Miller, Jay
I've been running with autoextend on (though limited to 2Gig) and never had a problem. -Original Message- Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:26 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L I run my SYSTEM tablesaces in autoextend, and have for some time. I run them that way from the

RE: System Tablespace and Autoextend

2002-11-07 Thread Hately, Mike (NESL-IT)
FWIW I'd go with Dennis here. I don't like AUTOEXTEND on the SYSTEM tablespace. (In fact I'm not overenamoured of AUTOEXTEND on any datfile, except maybe on dev and sandbox databases). If the SYSTEM tablespace isn't used for rollbacks (apart from the SYSTEM rollback) or temporary segments and the

RE: System Tablespace and Autoextend

2002-11-07 Thread Kip . Bryant
I use AUTOEXTEND and it has been extremely helpful to me in managing growth. However, my policy is not to use autoextend for SYSTEM, rollback tablespace, or temp tablespace. SYSTEM (for me) is relatively stable. The only time I have significant growth in SYSTEM is during an upgrade. For

RE: System Tablespace and Autoextend

2002-11-07 Thread Markham, Richard
Title: RE: System Tablespace and Autoextend I have read complaints about SYS.IDL% objects having PCTINCREASE 50 and space problems when they extend, in the forums. I went to check and mine are already set to 0 along with 2147483645 MAXEXTENTS. I created a TAR and verified with Oracle

RE: System Tablespace and Autoextend

2002-10-24 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS
Sam - I haven't made the system tablespace autoextend because I can't easily recover the space if it overextends. I would rather take the risk that something hits an error from a lack of space in the system tablespace. With other tablespaces you can always rebuild the tablespace if you need

Re: System Tablespace and Autoextend

2002-10-24 Thread JApplewhite
Sam, Autoextend caused tablespace corruption for me once, but it was over 5 years ago with Personal Oracle 7.3.2.3 on Win95 - not the most reliable OS that Oracle has ever ported to. ;-) We have several 8.1.7 databases here, on both Win2k and HPUX. Autoextend, even on System, has caused no

Re: System Tablespace and Autoextend

2002-10-24 Thread Yechiel Adar
Hello Sam I do not know specifically about SYSTEM tablespace but from a bitter experience beware of the 4GB limit. if a datafile on NT/2000 autoextend beyond a multiple of 4GB (8,12...) then that datafile is GONE. We had a production database crashing on this problem and had to call in Oracle

RE: System Tablespace and Autoextend

2002-10-24 Thread Freeman, Robert
I run my SYSTEM tablesaces in autoextend, and have for some time. I run them that way from the point of database creation and have never had a problem. There were some problems with autoextend in earlier versions of 8 (and I think they managed to migrate to early 8i versions as well) with 2GB