RE: UNION ALL Query: Riddle

2004-01-29 Thread Wendry
I have the same problem like you Rajesh, the query also gives different rowcount each time executed eventhough there's no one updating base tables, in my opinion it's because of the sorting operation (your group by clause). In my case after I remove some group functions, the result goes well. Also

RE: UNION ALL Query: Riddle

2004-01-29 Thread Jared Still
If what you are describing is completely accurate, ( no DML, change S_A_S fixes the problem ) then it would appear you have encountered a bug. A search on MetaLink is in order, and failing that, you need to open a TAR. Jared On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 04:59, Wendry wrote: I have the same problem

RE: UNION ALL Query: Riddle

2004-01-28 Thread Pillai, Rajesh
Hi Jared, Thanks for your response. different results mean that number of records are different sometimes, and sometimes the some of the quantities are not correct. Your help is really appreciated. Thanks, Rajesh -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: UNION ALL Query: Riddle

2004-01-28 Thread Jared Still
] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 2:29 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: Re: UNION ALL Query: Riddle Q: What does different results mean? Different row count? Completely different data

Re: UNION ALL Query: Riddle

2004-01-27 Thread Jared . Still
Q: What does different results mean? Different row count? Completely different data? Partially different data? Some columns have incorrect value? What about doing it without the parallel hints? The tables aren't so big that it would take a long time to find out. Jared Pillai, Rajesh