Title: Would you use 9i?
Hi
Christopher
It's
great that you are starting a new company.
Could
you tell me the about the employment oppurtunities in your company
;-)
Rgds,
Sachin
Puri
Oracle
Development and Administration
Solutions Inc
-Original Message-From
m: Christopher Spence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: RE: Would you use 9i?
> >Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 07:59:06 -0800
> >
> >What I was planing on doing, is usi
not recoding.
good luck and let us know -- I hate living on the bleeding edge :)
>From: Christopher Spence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Would you use 9i?
>Date: Fri, 24 Aug 200
PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 11:53
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
RE: RE: Would you use 9i?
i think AIX is still the redheaded, 2nd class stepchild when versions
come out. I mean 9i for linux came out before AIX.
joe
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTE
nts of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Would you use 9i?
>Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 07:59:06 -0800
>
>What I was planing on doing, is using as much flat 8.1.7 features, but take
>advantage of the 9i way of doing it.
>
>For example, 9i is faster in calls to sql
Having worked on all 3: Solaris is the most basic (open), AIX is done the IBM way
(unique to IBM), and HPUX is somewhere in the middle. They each leap frog one
another. I would go for the best bang for the buck. Nowadays, they are getting
desperate :)
As for Oracle versions, go for 9i.
Ge
i think AIX is still the redheaded, 2nd class stepchild when versions come
out. I mean 9i for linux came out before AIX.
joe
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/24/01 12:02PM
>>>
Solaris, AIX, or HP-UX.
I am
bias to Solaris as I am acustom to it, but with the change in direction of
Oracle, I am co
What I was planing on doing, is using as much flat 8.1.7 features, but take
advantage of the 9i way of doing it.
For example, 9i is faster in calls to sql from PLSQL, this will not effect
my PLSQL code in one bit.
The new OPS features, if I need to go to old OPS, won't need to change code.
If th
Title: Message
Solaris, AIX, or HP-UX.
I am
bias to Solaris as I am acustom to it, but with the change in direction of
Oracle, I am considering HP-UX, and due to the cost and performance benefits of
AiX, I am also looking there. So in answer, I really don't know. I
would like to say Sun
9i for sure...
Lets face it - in 2 months time, a nice little alert
will pop out on Metalink telling us how "support on
8.1.7.2 is on the way out, and all customers are
requested to upgade to 9" as they do with all the
"old" releases...
Connor
--- Christopher Spence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Title: Would you use 9i?
Christopher,
I would start using 9i as my development plan.
It has lot of bells and whistles like all other versions of Oracle many of them
may not work right from the get go. But it has some very good features which
can be used from day one like resumable SQL
you say that you will have 8.1.7 and 9i up during development, so that
you will be able to move back to 8.1.7 should something (a bug?) crop up.
Okay, are you planning on using no features in 9i that are not in 8.1.7? If
so, great. If not, you would have to redevelop and rethink the direction to
I'd go for it.
Give yourself a head start by making sure
you learn about what 9i can do. Don't just
wade in to using 8i to build a 7.3-style
application with a few bolt-ons.
Make the newness work for you.
Jonathan Lewis
Host to The Co-Operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/
13 matches
Mail list logo
