-L
> Subject: RE: _spin_count Revealed
>
>
> You're forgetting about the _counter_corriolis_effect
> parameter, introduced
> in 9i. If you set this to true, then you need to flip you're
> setting for
> _spin_count. I've also found it useful to buy har
(how's that?)
Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Gorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 12:38 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list OR
tember 18, 2002 12:38 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Re: _spin_count Revealed
>
>
> Such a drag to detract from a good story using facts...
>
> ...which is how the whole discussion got started...
>
> - Original Message -
> To: "M
al Message-
> > From: Grant Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 7:18 PM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> > Subject: RE: _spin_count Revealed
> >
> >
> > You're forgetting about the _counter_corriolis
; From: Grant Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 7:18 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: _spin_count Revealed
>
>
> You're forgetting about the _counter_corriolis_effect
> parameter, introduced
> in 9i. If
Fink, Dan[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> >I have learned that my information was incorrect. A negative value for
> spin count is not to be used for reversing transactions. It is to be used
> for those systems in the southern hemisphere to insure that the disks spin
> counter-clockwise.
> >
> >I
