mailing list. Michael Hesseltein
is doing a terrific job there!
-Original Message-
From: Dwayne Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 5:11 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: linux Oracle -- best combination
In a previous job
a terrific job there!
-Original Message-
From: Dwayne Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 5:11 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: linux Oracle -- best combination
In a previous job, I was running Red Hat 6.2 and Oracle
8.1.7
I've not really checked out Suse, you have to buy it versus being able
to get RH for free?
joe
Scott wrote:
I believe that Oracle has decided that when porting to
linux all products will be ported to SuSE and then
perform post release certifications on Redhat. I
believe stability and
Now Caldera is opening up original unix code under GPL (or a modifed version
of that), there will be even more fun in various versions that are available
freely.
Cheers
Raj
__
Rajendra Jamadagni MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot
PostGresSQL has been out for years, and is not RedHat specific, all
distributions have included it.
Do not criticize someone until you walked a mile in their shoes, that way
when you criticize them, you are a mile a way and have their shoes.
Christopher R. Spence
Oracle DBA
Phone: (978)
You can download Suse, but you have over 6,000 files to download. It's all
in a specific directory on there FTP server.
On the other hand, for RH you can just download a few ISO files and burn
them into CDs. Easy.
I believe that Suse Personal, with CD and manuals, is 30 bucks. I am
assuming
Yeah, the other thing, 6000 files which consist of 500Mb is about 10x slower
to download than 1 file which is 600Mb
The TCP protocol, ramps, which means, it gets up to speed within the first
few seconds of delivery, when your downloading many small files, your
bandwidth is cut down by 10 fold if
6000 files, what a pita, guess i'll stay with hacking rh to run oracle
:)
joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/22/01 10:16AM You
can download Suse, but you have over 6,000 files to download. It's
allin a specific directory on there FTP server.On the other hand,
for RH you can just download a few ISO
Joe,
It's cheap. $60-70 for the pro version.
Even though I've been a long time RH user, I prefer SuSE
simply for the documentation and admin utils.
Jared
On Wednesday 22 August 2001 04:50, Joe Testa wrote:
I've not really checked out Suse, you have to buy it versus being able
to get RH
and its only 2.3K :)
guess i'm spoiled being able to grab darn near anything that oracle has
from technet.
joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/22/01 11:00AM
True, but now RedHat pushes it as the 'Red Hat
Database'...http://www.redhat.com/products/software/database/Christopher
Spence wrote:
Title: RE: linux Oracle -- best combination
Have you tried an index hint on the first query yet?
Have you tried NVL(cmm_id,101) = 101,
NVL(cust_id,101) = 101
NVL(Friendly_session_id,100) = 100
loc_to_utc(NVL(creation_date,21-jun-2001')) between your dates?
-Original Message
granted $60 is not much but its A LOT more than free :)
joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/22/01 11:56AM
Joe,It's cheap. $60-70 for the pro
version.Even though I've been a long time RH user, I prefer
SuSEsimply for the documentation and admin utils.JaredOn
Wednesday 22 August 2001 04:50, Joe Testa
We're trying to re-write some SQL such that the index on columns in the
where clause is used.Logically ,the query is as below .But this query does
not use the Index .However ,if we re-write it as below(see 2nd query) - the
index is used :but the query returns incorrect results .Can you suggest
In a previous job, I was running Red Hat 6.2 and Oracle 8.1.7. This was
quite stable. Keep in mind that we were not supporting hundreds of users.
I prefer SuSE because of the docs so I was pleased to see them become the
'lead' platform for Oracle on Linux. Still, I have not had a chance to
of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: linux Oracle -- best combination
In a previous job, I was running Red Hat 6.2 and Oracle
8.1.7. This was
quite stable. Keep in mind that we were not supporting
hundreds of users.
I prefer SuSE because of the docs so I was pleased to see
them become
mailing list. Michael Hesseltein
is doing a terrific job there!
-Original Message-
From: Dwayne Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 5:11 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: linux Oracle -- best combination
In a previous job, I
Lisa and others,
About a year ago, I was working for a company as a Linux systems
engineer (Read as: Tech guy doing sales support). Most of our customers
wanted Linux systems, and it was my responsibility to provide them the
correct combination of Linux and hardware to meet their needs.
I would be curious to see these tests going forward, seeing as RedHat
support is difficult to do with 9i and such. And suse now being Oracle's
perfered linux. I wonder if these results have changed. I never really
played with Oracle on Linux, but if I ever had to, I would be curious.
Do not
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Red Hat Oracle's preferred Linux
distribution, right up until the time they announced the availability of the Red
Hat Database (PostgreSQL)?
Brian
Christopher Spence wrote:
I would be curious to see these tests going forward, seeing as RedHat
support is
I believe that Oracle has decided that when porting to
linux all products will be ported to SuSE and then
perform post release certifications on Redhat. I
believe stability and support of multiple Linux
distributions was a factor in this decision. I run
both Redhat and SuSE and I actually perfer
20 matches
Mail list logo
