RE: Re: IOT Tuning Question

2003-11-21 Thread Stephane Faroult
Zhu Chao, You are right to say that with a heap organized table you also have the index to encumber the SGA and indeed you are right to say that, as I put it, what I said is not totally correct. I should have been more specific. The reference to _partitioned_ IOTs implicitly associated them

Re: Re: IOT Tuning Question

2003-11-21 Thread Jay
Zhu/SF: Thanks for your insight. I was under the impression that Oracle did not recommend IOT for tables that where not fairly static. Would the reasoning for this not being an issue in this case be due to oracle now having to only maintain the IOT table blocks instead of the table blocks and

RE: IOT Tuning Question

2003-11-20 Thread Stephane Faroult
Jay, On the paper, your table is indeed a good candidate for an IOT - it will save you the space used by the table (you will only have the primary key index). However, there may be gotchas. I have noticed in the past that IOTs, being primarily indices, have a tendency to be a bit 'sticky'

Re: IOT Tuning Question

2003-11-20 Thread zhu chao
Hi, Jay: Since your table is just a table with 1M records and you have only three columns(all of them are pk), so using IOT is really an good candicate. The space save is not important because 1M records with three columns typically consumes several megabytes, which is not important at