AW: Re: Object Types in PL/SQL

2003-07-21 Thread Stefan Jahnke
gliche Nachricht- Von: Nuno Souto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. Juli 2003 14:05 An: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Betreff: Re: Re: Object Types in PL/SQL - Original Message - > how does the object features improve performance of the jdbc? its fairly

Re: Re: Object Types in PL/SQL

2003-07-17 Thread Nuno Souto
- Original Message - > how does the object features improve performance of the jdbc? its fairly common now to have a java or .net(which we are using) and an Oracle backend. > When we started to use JDBC, one of the things I noticed was some very unusual network traffic. Certainly more t

AW: Re: Object Types in PL/SQL

2003-07-16 Thread Stefan Jahnke
ipients of list ORACLE-L Betreff: Re: Re: Object Types in PL/SQL how does the object features improve performance of the jdbc? its fairly common now to have a java or .net(which we are using) and an Oracle backend. your comments would be much appreciated. > > From: "Nuno Souto" <

Re: Re: Object Types in PL/SQL

2003-07-16 Thread rgaffuri
:54:32 EDT > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Object Types in PL/SQL > > - Original Message - > > We actually don't use Object Types that much (who does anyway ;). But I have > > to say, that I'm a little bit disa

Re: Object Types in PL/SQL

2003-07-16 Thread Nuno Souto
- Original Message - > We actually don't use Object Types that much (who does anyway ;). But I have > to say, that I'm a little bit disappointed by Oracle's implementation (Ever I do. Only way to use some of the DMBS_* library items and one of the best ways of speeding up Java/JDBC inte

RE: Object Types in PL/SQL

2003-07-15 Thread Pardee, Roy E
This doesn't answer your question directly, but if you aren't able to override the constructor explicitly, you can probably create a static function that creates, initializes & returns a tVNR as you would like it. HTH, -Roy Roy Pardee Programmer/Analyst/DBA SWFPAC Lockheed Martin IT Extension

Re: Object Types in PL/SQL

2003-07-15 Thread rgaffuri
if im reading your code right... looks like your overriding in an anonymous block. in most OO languages overriding is done by a child class. i dont see any subclassing here? didnt they add sub-types and 'extends' to 9.2? btw, are you using object oriented design in your database? How efficient