Re: Re[2]: Cobol redefine in SQL

2003-11-27 Thread Jared Still
This sounds exactly like some programs I was forced to work on at one time that were written in a variant of Business Basic. There's good BASIC, and there's BAD BASIC. This was very bad BAD BASIC. The value of part of a string in a file was used to determine what was in the rest of the string, a

Re[2]: Cobol redefine in SQL

2003-11-27 Thread Jonathan Gennick
Thursday, November 27, 2003, 8:44:25 AM, Stephane Paquette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: SP> I'm looking for a solution that is using only one table not multiple tables. SP> In fact a dynamic column redefinition feature (cobol redefines) is what I need in Oracle SQL. Much as I like REDEFINES in COBO

Re[2]: Cobol redefine in SQL

2003-11-26 Thread Jonathan Gennick
Wednesday, November 26, 2003, 7:44:25 PM, Jared Still ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: JS> Oh, so *that's* what a cobol redefine is. JS> How incredibly ugly. Must have been someone's JS> crutch for poor (or no) design. No, no, no. REDEFINE is very powerful. It's part of the COBOL magic. Best regards