I would not say any vendor. I have yet to have an issue with HP and
failover.
Its worked every time and is relatively easy to setup and use.
I have no experience with any other vendor in that area though.
-Original Message-
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 1:35 PM
To: Multiple recipients o
On Sunday 20 January 2002 06:45, Mogens Nørgaard wrote:
>
> Here's something else I've been wondering about: If the rather smart
> folks at the various Unix vendors (they're hardly any stupider than us
> on this list, do you think?) cannot get this stuff to work after having
> tried for many years
To be truly contrary to anyone else :) here are some thoughts we've been
trying to think recently here at Miracle regarding clusters and OPS/RAC from
Oracle:
There can be three main reasons for using clusters (I think):
- High availability. But how often does a Unix or Windows2000 server crash
bcc: CHITALE Hemant Krishnarao/Prin DBA/CSM/ST Group)
paying Sun great sums of money. The Sun web site has more info on HA.
Let me know if you need more info.
Good luck!
Barb
> --
> From: James McCann[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:40 AM
> To: Mul
I've seen a similar idea running on Silicon Graphics kit :
2 servers;
heartbeat check between them;
Drives mount on the other box when the 'live' system fails
It was nice when it worked...Testing the failover caused barely a ripple,
although it did disconnect any open sessions. A
p, but you'll be
paying Sun great sums of money. The Sun web site has more info on HA.
Let me know if you need more info.
Good luck!
Barb
> --
> From: James McCann[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:40
Speaking of TAF,
Does anyone know (or have tested/implemented/explored) TAF with Forms
application? Does this work??
We have another JAVA application that connects using JDBC and looks for
certain errors and whenever it detects an error (appropriate one), it
reconnects to the other side. Both si
You'd probably lose
> less data
> than with a standby (since you pick up with the same drives mounted
> on the
> other box), but it depends on how you have the standby implemented.
>
> There's no additional cost from Oracle to run this crap, but you'll
> be
&
PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:40 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Standby Instance questions and HA
>
> Hi,
> I was reading in the book "Oracle 24/7 Tips and Techniques" about
ames McCann[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:40 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Standby Instance questions and HA
>
> Hi,
> I was reading in the book "Oracle 24/7 T
he drives are re-mounted on the 2nd box if a failover
> occurs.) Your users still get disconnected. You'd probably lose
> less data
> than with a standby (since you pick up with the same drives mounted
> on the
> other box), but it depends on how you have the standby implemen
]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:40 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Standby Instance questions and HA
>
> Hi,
> I was reading in the book "Oracle 24/7 Tips and Techniques" about
> Standby
> Instances.
>
> Note,
> From: James McCann[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:40 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Standby Instance questions and HA
>
> Hi,
> I was reading in the book "Oracl
eply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:40 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Standby Instance questions and HA
>
> Hi,
> I was reading in the book "Oracle 24/7 Tips and Techniques" about
> Standby
>
> From: James McCann[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:40 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Standby Instance questions and HA
>
> Hi,
> I was reading in the book
D]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:40 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Standby Instance questions and HA
>
> Hi,
> I was reading in the book "Oracle 24/7 Tips and Techniques" about
> Standby
> Instances.
>
> Note,
Let me know if you need more info.
Good luck!
Barb
> --
> From: James McCann[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:40 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Standby
anuary 17, 2002 5:40 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Standby Instance questions and HA
>
> Hi,
> I was reading in the book "Oracle 24/7 Tips and Techniques" about
> Standby
> Instances.
>
> Note, this is not a standby database.
>
e info.
Good luck!
Barb
> --
> From: James McCann[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:40 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Standby Instance questions and HA
>
> H
d more info.
> Good luck!
>
> Barb
>
>
> > --
> > From: James McCann[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:40 AM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> >
> From: James McCann[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:40 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Standby Instance questions and HA
>
> Hi,
> I was reading in the book &q
It's not an Oracle thing, so there wouldn't be anything in the docs
yes, you need a clustered environment, or at the least the ability for
the disks to be mounted on the second server when the first one goes
down.
As long as the disk that oracle has been installed on is one of the
ones that move
, January 17, 2002 5:40 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Standby Instance questions and HA
>
> Hi,
> I was reading in the book "Oracle 24/7 Tips and Techniques" about
> Standby
> Instances.
>
> Note, this is not a standby databas
Good luck!
Barb
> --
> From: James McCann[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:40 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Standby Instance questions and HA
>
> Hi,
&g
Solaris, I know nothing so will be of no help to you there.
"James McCann"
lecom.com> cc:
Sent by:Subject: Standby Instance
questions and HA
[EM
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:40 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Standby Instance questions and HA
>
> Hi,
> I was reading in the book "Oracle 24/7 Tips and Techniques" about
> Standby
lecom.com> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Standby Instance
questions and HA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/17/2002 06:40
AM
Please respond
cc:
Sent by:Subject: Standby Instance
questions and HA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/17/2002 06:40
AM
Please respond
to ORACLE-L
Hi,
I was readin
cCann"
lecom.com> cc:
Sent by:Subject: Standby Instance
questions and HA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/17/2002 06:40
AM
Please respond
Subject: Standby Instance questions
and HA
[EM
Hi,
I was reading in the book "Oracle 24/7 Tips and Techniques" about Standby
Instances.
Note, this is not a standby database.
>From the book it seams to work in the following way...
There is only one database.
The database files exist on a shared disk pack. One machine is the primary
instanc
32 matches
Mail list logo
