thanksmaking a list...checking it twice
|| -Original Message-
|| From: Hillman, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|| Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 10:55 AM
|| To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
|| Subject: RE: When to go for ORACLE NAMES Server
||
||
|| I beleave intelligent
, Sussex, WI USA
> -Original Message-
> From: Hillman, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 09:55
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: When to go for ORACLE NAMES Server
>
>
> I beleave intelligent agent requires tnsn
Original Message-
> || From: Jared Still [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> || Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 11:50 PM
> || To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> || Subject: Re: When to go for ORACLE NAMES Server
> ||
> ||
> ||
> || Ross,
> ||
> || What I was referring to w
ort.
Jared
>
> - ross
> ( i won't FedEx you a burger, but write yerself a raincheck)
>
> || -Original Message-
> || From: Jared Still [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> || Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 11:50 PM
> || To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
list ORACLE-L
|| Subject: Re: When to go for ORACLE NAMES Server
||
||
||
|| Ross,
||
|| What I was referring to was using Oracle Forms directly on
|| Unix, *not* through iAS. iAS takes care of that stuff for
|| you.
||
|| Lesse, I tried using forms 5.x on Solaris a couple of years
|| ago, and mu
ds tnsnames?
>
> *thanks*
>
> Ross
>
> || -Original Message-
> || From: Jared Still [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> || Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 1:43 PM
> || To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mohan, Ross
> || Subject: Re: When to go for ORACLE NAMES Server
> ||
>
Oh, you wanted to set it up on NT? I CAN'T EVEN GET 8.1.6 ONAMES
*INSTALLED*, much less running! I finally just gave up and went with our
development HP9000 L-class as the "backup" server.
Erm, one other thing I just remembered: We are running 8.1.6 Networking on
the HP. Since my ONAMES is 8.
Title: RE: When to go for ORACLE NAMES Server
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> We have 20+ instances & this mess called PeopleSoft, so
> keeping track of
> TNSNAMES is a real tedious thing to do. Consequently we
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|| Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 1:43 PM
|| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mohan, Ross
|| Subject: Re: When to go for ORACLE NAMES Server
||
||
||
|| Somewhat of a pain to setup for the first time, for sure.
||
|| But after you get it implemented, you will never want to
|| go back
Title: RE: When to go for ORACLE NAMES Server
There is one thing to be aware of. In a very large
environment, (which you may or may not have) you
don't always want everyone to be able to connect to
everywhere. By using tnsnames.ora files, we can control
which clients are allowed to co
.DIRECTORY_PATH= (ONAMES)
> -Original Message-
> From: Johnson Poovathummoottil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 11:15
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: When to go for ORACLE NAMES Server
>
>
> There is another thread g
ltiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> || Subject: When to go for ORACLE NAMES Server
> ||
> ||
> || There is another thread going on about no database on
> || a single server, I have another question to ask.
> ||
> || We have nearly 30 databases across Sun and Win 2000
>
hummoottil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|| Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 12:15 PM
|| To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
|| Subject: When to go for ORACLE NAMES Server
||
||
|| There is another thread going on about no database on
|| a single server, I have another question to ask.
||
|| We have
There is another thread going on about no database on
a single server, I have another question to ask.
We have nearly 30 databases across Sun and Win 2000
Platforms. We are finding it tedious to keep track of
tnsnames.ora. While looking out for a solution we hit
at ORACLE Names server. I hear i
14 matches
Mail list logo
