Re: any problem rebuilding indexes used for replication

2003-11-06 Thread Wolfgang Breitling
gt; > > > Are you targeting certain indexes that have been identified as > > benefiting from a rebuild, or just planning to rebuild all indexes? > > > > Jared > > > > > > > > > > renu r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] &

Re: any problem rebuilding indexes used for replication

2003-11-06 Thread Yong Huang
e bacause the size of table is big so it is not definitive. I > will > > > check the level after rebuild. > > > > > > Benefits expected : Space savings (definitely). performance (hopefully). > I > > > will let you and Yong know about the benefits if any. If I

Re: any problem rebuilding indexes used for replication

2003-11-06 Thread Yong Huang
/2003 02:59 PM > Please respond to ORACLE-L > > > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc: > Subject:Re: any problem rebuilding indexes used for > replication > > > renu (and Jared), > > T

Re: any problem rebuilding indexes used for replication

2003-11-06 Thread zhu chao
> > What benefits do you expect from the rebuild of the indexes? > > > > Are you targeting certain indexes that have been identified as > > benefiting from a rebuild, or just planning to rebuild all indexes? > > > > Jared > > > > > > > > >

Re: any problem rebuilding indexes used for replication

2003-11-06 Thread Jared . Still
t ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>         cc:                 Subject:        Re: any problem rebuilding indexes used for replication renu (and Jared), The reason I'm very interested in whether there's performance improvement is that there's a thread on the newsgroup about index rebu

Re: any problem rebuilding indexes used for replication

2003-11-06 Thread Yong Huang
t; > > renu r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 11/05/2003 06:14 PM > Please respond to ORACLE-L > > > To:Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc: > Subject:

Re: any problem rebuilding indexes used for replication

2003-11-06 Thread Jared . Still
ACLE-L                 To:        Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>         cc:                 Subject:        Re: any problem rebuilding indexes used for replication Jared : I think it is fragmented based on scripts and knowing that there have been lot of deletes.   One

Re: any problem rebuilding indexes used for replication

2003-11-06 Thread renu r
Jared : I think it is fragmented based on scripts and knowing that there have been lot of deletes.   One script uses the table index_stats and looks at field del_lf_rows which should be less at least  in comparison to field lf_rows. I mean less is good. more bad.  I am not sure about the script but

Re: any problem rebuilding indexes used for replication

2003-11-06 Thread Jared . Still
D]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  11/05/2003 06:14 PM  Please respond to ORACLE-L                 To:        Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>         cc:                 Subject:        any problem rebuilding indexes used for replication Hello,   I have to rebuild

Re: any problem rebuilding indexes used for replication

2003-11-05 Thread Yong Huang
Hi, renu, I'll let experts anwser your question. But I have a request for you. Before and after you rebuild (or coalesce) your indexes, please make close observation on your application performance, as well as the statistics and sizes of the indexes. I'd like to know whether rebuilding them actual

any problem rebuilding indexes used for replication

2003-11-05 Thread renu r
Hello,   I have to rebuild some primary key indexes due to excessive fragmentation. It is rebuild not drop and create. We have multi master replication running. Is there any problem to replication if I do that. Has anyone tried it? TIA.  Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail Address