And what does KGL stand for ?
Thanks !
-Original Message-
Sent: ? 10 ? 2003 19:45
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Read Only Dependencies in the KGL.
Best Regards,
K Gopalakrishnan
-Original Message-
Mike (NESL-IT)
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 8:39 AM
To:
Andrey Bronfin wrote:
And what does KGL stand for ?
Thanks !
[K]ernel layer [G]eneric layer [L]ibrary cache manager. Feeling better
:-) ?
-Original Message-
Sent: ? 10 ? 2003 19:45
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Read Only Dependencies in the KGL.
Best Regards,
thay are also sending oracle database release 2 on this link
From: "Nicolai Tufar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Oracle CD's
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 21:43:55 -0800
And how does one find out more information about such cryptic, undocumented
tables??
experience? RD? be in company of more experienced people?
wat else?
Regards
Naveen
-Original Message-
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 5:29 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Andrey Bronfin
THANKS ;-)
-Original Message-
Sent: ? 12 ? 2003 13:59
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Andrey Bronfin wrote:
And what does KGL stand for ?
Thanks !
[K]ernel layer [G]eneric layer [L]ibrary cache manager. Feeling better
:-) ?
-Original Message-
Sent: ? 10
Naveen Nahata wrote:
And how does one find out more information about such cryptic, undocumented
tables??
experience? RD? be in company of more experienced people?
wat else?
Regards
Naveen
Doc which should not have left Oracle? In practice, the meaning of names
you cannot guess
Stephane you have WAY too much free time :)
seriously, I let you guys muck around the internals and I learn from
your postings. Me, I'm busy enough just trying to keep my developers
from designing tables without thought to how Oracle handles things.
--- Stephane Faroult [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jonathan,
Since you've mentioned it, how about summarizing those
mistakes for the rest of us?
This goes for you too, Mogens. :)
A few things didn't sound right to me, but I don't often spend
time doing actual tuning of the database.
My tuning usually involves fixing or working around
On Friday 10 January 2003 14:48, Mogens Nørgaard wrote:
Obviously, we don't know what we're talking about. I can see there's a
presentation by Rich Niemich at IOUG-A where he'll address all those
idiots who are saying you should ignore the Cash Hit Ratio (and who are
all just after making big
Geez Tom, I didn't realize it was so simple. ;)
On Friday 10 January 2003 11:04, Mercadante, Thomas F wrote:
separate and simplify the issues.
develop a bullet-proof backup and recovery plan for the Rman repository
*first*.
then develop plans for production databases.
trying to do both
Find, but someone else can admin them. ;)
Jared
On Friday 10 January 2003 11:30, Rachel Carmichael wrote:
couldn't hurt on the last two at least :)
--- Jamadagni, Rajendra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rachel,
do you think we need following lists created ...
* oracle-l-overheard
*
Thanks Mogen. Let's see if something comes of it.
In the meantime, I only collect lvl 0 in that database.
Jared
On Friday 10 January 2003 13:29, Mogens Nørgaard wrote:
Juan Loaize and the guys in ST (Server Technologies) in Oracle
Development added some index structures to certain x$-things
and those people sell a tuning tool hm, I hadn't noticed any
selling going on here. Or perhaps it's been subliminal?
--- Jared Still [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 10 January 2003 14:48, Mogens Nørgaard wrote:
Obviously, we don't know what we're talking about. I can see
there's a
Hmm,
Lately? That actually started publicly in 1998 as far as I am concerned ;-)
And acutally long before that.
Anjo.
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 11:43 PM
On Friday 10 January 2003 14:48, Mogens
Precise Indepth for Oracle relates SQL statements to PL/SQL procedures
without quering any X$ tables. So may you should buy that, but that may
not be an option for you ;-)
Anjo.
Stephane Faroult wrote:
.
My aim, remember, was to relate a PL/SQL block to the statements it
issues, so X$KGLRD
To add an example of what Anjo, Morgens and everyone else is talking about,
here is a perfect illustration of why focusing on BCHR is like
concentrating intensely on how fast your tyres rotate in a Tour de France,
instead of looking of where you are going (probably a lot more useful).
Another
Thanx a lot for a very comprehensive answer.
More than the result, I learnt the method. thanx a lot
Regards
Naveen
-Original Message-
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 9:04 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Naveen Nahata wrote:
And how does one find out more information
Hi All
I would like to know the difference between using the Stored procedures in
DB Triggers and writing the code directly in the DB Trigger. Which would be
better to use and what r the advantages.
Rgds
Sathya
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author:
INET:
And quite a number of folks were making use of the v$
stats quite some time before that with little regard for the BCHR,
though maybe not officially yet ignoring the BCHR
Jared
On Sunday 12 January 2003 17:03, Anjo Kolk wrote:
Hmm,
Lately? That actually started publicly in 1998 as far as
Read THIS fabulous manual:
http://www.bookpool.com/.x/pbsr99hds8/sm/0596003811
Ferenc Mantfeld
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 5:04 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:DB Triggers vs
The problem with rsh is as follows.
The actual script is as follows.
echo subbu
su finacle -c '. /etc/b2k/ncb/com/commonenv.com;cd
/finacle/ncb/b2kcomp1/3.0/bin;./stops'
echo After stops
sleep 5
su finacle -c '. /etc/b2k/ncb/com/commonenv.com;cd
/finacle/ncb/b2kcomp1/3.0/bin;./runs'
21 matches
Mail list logo
