Thanks all. Looks like I'll have to go with the add-an-extra-parameter
method for now as a workaround.
I don't know yet wether we're going to raise a TAR right away. The manual is
a little bit unclear about overriding the default constructor. So I might
contact a friend at Oracle first. I'll post
Hi
The anonnymous block at the bottom of my email is just a little test driver.
Basically, I don't use subtyping here. I just override the default
constructor.
If I don't implement a constructor at all, I would look like this:
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE tVNR AS OBJECT
(
vVNR VARCHAR2(14),
ok then i missed it. where is the overriding taking place? I saw a base constructor..
where was the 'override'?
From: Stefan Jahnke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2003/07/15 Tue AM 08:30:30 EDT
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: Object Types in PL/SQL
Hi
: Re: AW: Object Types in PL/SQL
ok then i missed it. where is the overriding taking place? I saw a base
constructor.. where was the 'override'?
From: Stefan Jahnke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2003/07/15 Tue AM 08:30:30 EDT
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW
!).
BTW this works also in 8i, it's not just 9i.
Cheers
Nuno Souto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. Juli 2003 14:44
An: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Betreff: Re: AW: Object Types in PL/SQL
ok then i missed it. where
support guys say. If you do, please
post what they say.
From: Nuno Souto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2003/07/15 Tue AM 09:49:24 EDT
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AW: Object Types in PL/SQL
- Original Message -
That is what I want to do
