:
Subject:Procedural Consistency
Okay, I know I'm being a little lazy on this one, but I'm very interested
to hear the ideas/conjecture/proof. So away we go
We recently encountered a bug in Oracle where a long running process
attempted to execute a procedure that was within
]
09/24/2002 01:43 PM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Procedural Consistency
Okay, I know I'm being a little lazy on this one, but I'm very interested
to hear the ideas/conjecture/proof. So
The app was getting an ORA-600, which metalink identified as a 'bug' in 9i.
The app uses persistent connections and the 'login' package had been
recompiled without removing the connections. All of a sudden the ORA-600s
started being thrown.
It made me curious (call me George) as to how Oracle
What is the error and how is the error occuring? My experience has been:
1. Long running SQL calling PL/SQL function:will die due to invalidated
state of the function.
2. Long running PL/SQL calling PL/SQL procedure (statically): cannot
re-compile the procedure during the run as it is
Okay, I know I'm
being a little lazy on this one, but I'm very interested to hear the
ideas/conjecture/proof. So away we go
We recently
encountered a bug in Oracle where a long running process attempted to execute a
procedure that was within a package that had been recompiled since the
Fink, Dan wrote:
Okay, I know I'm being a little lazy on this one, but I'm very
interested to hear the ideas/conjecture/proof. So away we go
We recently encountered a bug in Oracle where a long running process
attempted to execute a procedure that was within a package that had
been
