RE: Another datafile sizing question

2002-09-26 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS
Darren - Let me try to clarify my answer. 1. Yes, 800-meg is not really large with today's disk systems, so that consolidation should be no problem. 2. If you are doing this type of consolidation, I think it would be a good time for you to take as step back for broader perspective. Specifically,

RE: Another datafile sizing question

2002-09-26 Thread Browett, Darren
Our SAN has been setup as RAID5, so the use of single large datafiles is probably the method I will go with, using the added option of resizing once I read up on it some more :) Darren -Original Message- Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 8:13 PM To: Multiple recipients of list

RE: Another datafile sizing question

2002-09-26 Thread Browett, Darren
that is something I didn't consider, I will look into it further. Thanks Darren -Original Message- Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 5:48 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Is there a reason you can't just resize the existing file? -Original Message- Sent:

RE: Another datafile sizing question

2002-09-26 Thread Browett, Darren
Thanks Dennis I was going to use LMT's, I didn't mention it in my email as I thought it would be irrelevant to the question I was asking. The first database in question to move is oracle financials 11.5.7 which requires you to move to LMT's Darren -Original Message- Sent: Thursday,

Re: Another datafile sizing question

2002-09-26 Thread Thomas Day
Is the requirement that all datafiles be the same size a business requirement? I guess that having all datafiles the same size would be useful if you need to move them to other platters. Do you have multiple physical devices to move your datafiles around in? If you only have a single RAID

RE: Another datafile sizing question

2002-09-25 Thread Johnston, Tim
Is there a reason you can't just resize the existing file? -Original Message- Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 7:43 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L I am in the process of upgrading our databases from 8.0.5 to 8.1.7, possibly 9i depending on application certifications.

RE: Another datafile sizing question

2002-09-25 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS
Darren - My advice would be to read up on Locally Managed Tablespaces (LMT) and uniform extents. This is a new feature that will ease your management work. Dennis Williams DBA Lifetouch, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 6:43 PM To: Multiple

RE: Another datafile sizing question

2002-09-25 Thread paquette stephane
It's late at night maybe that's why I do not understand your answer but I do not see the link between LMT and the number/size of datafiles. One reason of multiple datafiles id to spread IO but since nowadays a majority of sites goes on huge disk box using raid 5 (that's what we have, the unix