We purchased Autosys when it was owned by Platinum and continue to use it today
for all of our production jobs. The server and clients are running on AIX
4.3.3. and we have had no problems with the product.
@fatcity.com on 10/18/2002 08:19 AM PST
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: RE: CA's AutoSys
Run Screaming in the opposite direction.
Product was a semi-disaster at two previous
job sites. Failed to run jobs when scheduled,
failed to detected when dependent jobs failed.
Just plain didn't work well.
Of course this was when Platinum owned the product,
who
Dick,
We have been using that product for quite some time now... and it does a
pretty good job of scheduling things. In our environment *all* jobs are
handled by Autosys, and we are not supposed to use 'cron'. We use the
product for scheduling jobs on a variety of h/w platforms( IBM-AIX, HP,
Title: RE: CA's AutoSys
I too
had issues with this product... But, it was several years ago...
Back then it was owned by Platinum and the product ran on NT 3.51... We
were using it to schedule all our Unix batch jobs for the Sales Force Automation
project I was working on... Unfortunately
We use CA-Workload which I think is the same product packaged
differently. We schedule about 400 jobs each night through it. The
jobs run on NT, VMS, Oracle, and Oracle Express with interdependencies
between jobs on different platforms. I have to say it works pretty
well, but only after about
by: Subject: RE: CA's AutoSys
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Oh, I don't know about that. At one of the places you used to work, they
_finally_ got it to work, but it did need at least one full-time, dedicated
employee to monitor, maintain and massage it.
Terry Ball, DBA
Birch Telecom
Work: 816-300-1335
FAX: 816-300-1800
-Original
Title: RE: CA's AutoSys
I think we may be talking about the same
place Terry, aren't we?
Matt Adams
-Original Message-
From: Ball, Terry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 4:09 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: CA's AutoSys
Oh, I
