Re: More slower CPUs vs. fewer faster CPUs

2001-02-23 Thread Gene Sais
And don't forget Oracle Power Unit Licensing costs? # cpus is a multiplier. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/23 8:20 AM I was wondering if it would be better to have three or four relatively slower CPUs than having only two faster ones. I think I remember that Ixora says fewer faster CPUs is better

RE: More slower CPUs vs. fewer faster CPUs

2001-02-23 Thread Boivin, Patrice J
I realize too that it depends on the number of concurrent user sessions. Patrice Boivin Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA) -Original Message- From: Boivin, Patrice J [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 9:20 AM To:

Re: More slower CPUs vs. fewer faster CPUs

2001-02-23 Thread William Beilstein
..and so is the speed of the processors "Gene Sais" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/23/01 09:01AM And don't forget Oracle Power Unit Licensing costs? # cpus is a multiplier. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/23 8:20 AM I was wondering if it would be better to have three or four relatively slower CPUs than having

RE: More slower CPUs vs. fewer faster CPUs

2001-02-23 Thread Brian D. Silverio
The following discussion assumes "big buss SMP" not MPP or any of its derivations. Your mileage may vary. If you have one CPU then all of the multiple CPU code in the kernel is not used. There is a penalty that is paid for the second and subsequent cpu's. So, the answer is... it depends!