RE: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-21 Thread Igor Neyman
]: Oracle vs Mysql At 03:29 PM 1/20/2004, you wrote: I do indeed. Rumor was that rpt/rpf was written by Larry himself. Now I understand! I once applied for a job at Oracle, and got asked: What do you think about RPT/RPF. My answer: Probably som hobby-project of one or another developer, which

RE: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-21 Thread Goulet, Dick
yup Dick GouletSenior Oracle DBAOracle Certified 8i DBA -Original Message-From: Carel-Jan Engel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 5:29 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: Re: Re[2]: Oracle vs MysqlAt 03:29 PM 1/20/2004, you wrote:

Re: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread Mladen Gogala
On 2004.01.19 23:39, Jonathan Gennick wrote: I used to use a SQL Module compiler. Not with Oracle though. It's rare for me to run into someone else who likes that approach. Actually, it's rare for me to encounter someone who's even heard of it... Jonathan, I've been around for a long time.

Re: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread Nuno Souto
- Original Message - Jonathan, I've been around for a long time. I've seen things like DataLens for Lotus123, SQL*Calc, Easy*SQL, then there was an Oracle Beat ya: Oracle Add-In for Lotus 123. Using Ora*Net (Async), V4.1.4. 1987. And demoed to the press that same year. g,dr

RE: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread Thater, William
Mladen Gogala scribbled on the wall in glitter crayon: On 2004.01.19 23:39, Jonathan Gennick wrote: I used to use a SQL Module compiler. Not with Oracle though. It's rare for me to run into someone else who likes that approach. Actually, it's rare for me to encounter someone who's even

RE: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread Mercadante, Thomas F
Ahhh. Sql*Calc, Sql*Graph, Sqr EasySqr. Those were the good old days. Tom Mercadante Oracle Certified Professional -Original Message- Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 8:05 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Mladen Gogala scribbled on the wall in glitter crayon: On

RE: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread Jesse, Rich
Then here's a rare treat for you! I *loved* SQL mods in RDB. I could make a program in MACRO, BASIC, FORTRAN, BLISS, Ada, DIBOL, or Mladen's favorite COBOL, and could effortlessly have them do DB work. I also didn't have to hunt thru all the source for a single SQL statement since they were in

Re: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread KENNETH JANUSZ
Do you remember IBM System 3/10? RPGII flat files? 120 col. punch cards? No hard drives? My $0.02 worth, Ken Janusz, CPIM - Original Message - To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 8:39 AM Careful Mladen, your revealing your

RE: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread Mercadante, Thomas F
The RPT RPF Oracle class was what made me go looking very quickly for a batch Oracle tool. Then I found SQR. (This was all before PL/SQL and the current versions of Oracle Reports). We bought it and the rest was history. Why Oracle didn't buy SQR when they had a chance amazes me. Tom

RE: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread Jesse, Rich
I've got my GX21-9129-9 right here in front of me. It should be in a museum... I'll take Obscure Geek References for $800, Alex. Rich Rich JesseSystem/Database Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA -Original Message-

Re: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread Mladen Gogala
I do indeed. Rumor was that rpt/rpf was written by Larry himself. On 01/20/2004 09:39:34 AM, Goulet, Dick wrote: Careful Mladen, your revealing your age!! Bet you remember RPT RPF as well!! Dick Goulet Senior Oracle DBA Oracle Certified 8i DBA -Original Message- Sent: Tuesday,

Re: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread Mladen Gogala
On 01/20/2004 08:04:33 AM, Thater, William wrote: Mladen Gogala scribbled on the wall in glitter crayon: oh damn, have we been at this too long?;-) Yes, we probably have. I must say that the spirit of Oracle Corp. has changed significantly since the days of Geoff Squire, Chris Ellis, Richard

RE: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread Goulet, Dick
Probably because they were dropping RPT RPF SQR smells a lot like it, YUCK! Dick Goulet Senior Oracle DBA Oracle Certified 8i DBA -Original Message- Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 10:09 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L The RPT RPF Oracle class was what made me go

RE: Re: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread Stephane Faroult
[snip] 120 col. punch cards? You had a high-density model. Mine only had 80 cols, of which 72 were usable for my goto-happy Fortran statements. SF No hard drives? My $0.02 worth, Ken Janusz, CPIM - Original Message - To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread Goulet, Dick
Careful Mladen, your revealing your age!! Bet you remember RPT RPF as well!! Dick Goulet Senior Oracle DBA Oracle Certified 8i DBA -Original Message- Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:04 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L On 2004.01.19 23:39, Jonathan Gennick wrote: I

Re: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread Mladen Gogala
On 01/20/2004 10:09:34 AM, KENNETH JANUSZ wrote: Do you remember IBM System 3/10? RPGII flat files? 120 col. punch cards? No hard drives? My $0.02 worth, Ken Janusz, CPIM I've never done anything with System/3. My first IBM was 3084 with MVS and IMS, running on 8M RAM. After an upgrade, it was a

RE: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread Orr, Steve
RPT was great stuff. In addition to SELECT statements it could do full DML, DDL, and DCL (I think.) Like Unix it was just particular on who it was friendly with. :-) Then there was RPT2C. Now there's perl. Eschewing the pointy-clicky stuff. -Original Message- Sent: Tuesday, January

RE: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread Goulet, Dick
YES! Dick Goulet Senior Oracle DBA Oracle Certified 8i DBA -Original Message- Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 10:10 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Do you remember IBM System 3/10? RPGII flat files? 120 col. punch cards? No hard drives? My $0.02 worth, Ken Janusz, CPIM

Re: Re: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread KENNETH JANUSZ
The old IBM System3 machines used 120 col. punch cards. And initially they had no HD's. Everything was done with cards and a reader/sorter. To compile a program you took the code you wrote, punched it into cards and then put it behind a stack of cards that was the compiler. The machine read

Re: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread eric king
What RPT and RPF exactly are? Are they some sort of reporting tool? - Original Message - To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 11:19 AM RPT was great stuff. In addition to SELECT statements it could do full DML, DDL, and DCL (I

RE: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread Goulet, Dick
Jonathan, The only reason MySql is known better is that big mouth equal to Bill Gates in Finland. Otherwise PostGreSql is the much better product. Dick Goulet Senior Oracle DBA Oracle Certified 8i DBA -Original Message- Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 1:49 PM To: Multiple

RE: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread Orr, Steve
Yupp. RPF=report formatter or some such. -Original Message- eric king Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 1:19 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L What RPT and RPF exactly are? Are they some sort of reporting tool? - Original Message - To: Multiple recipients of list

RE: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread Goulet, Dick
Eric, They were the precusors to Oracle reports. RPT was the report extraction tool, and RPF was the report formatter. Dick Goulet Senior Oracle DBA Oracle Certified 8i DBA -Original Message- Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 3:19 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

RE: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread Bellow, Bambi
But, unless you have old diskettes... you'll never see them. They died with the demise of v5. -Original Message- Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:29 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Yupp. RPF=report formatter or some such. -Original Message- eric king Sent:

Re: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread Mladen Gogala
On 01/20/2004 03:29:33 PM, Goulet, Dick wrote: Jonathan, The only reason MySql is known better is that big mouth equal to Bill Gates in Finland. Otherwise PostGreSql is the much better product. Dick Goulet Senior Oracle DBA Oracle Certified 8i DBA Dick, when you are talking about big

Re: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread mkline1
I know I used to set up RPT and do all sorts of complex updating things. At the State and with things coming from mainframes, the data organization seemed to lend itself well to RPT. Since the organization was like of loops within loops, I could take the high order update and then loop through

Re: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread Tanel Poder
Dick, when you are talking about big mouth from Finland, you probably don't refer to Pamela Anderson, also from Finland? The other person from Finland, whom I will not mention except by the first name (Linus) should be given credit for a wonderful OS that is successfully breaking the MS

RE: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread Goulet, Dick
If Mr Torvalds needs a security blanket, I'd be happy to send him several. Yes he crafted a wonderful OS I sincerely hope he knocks Billy Gates down to size. Seems to be doing one heck of a job at it, even with SCO on MicroSlop's side. MS Anderson appears headed for the twilight, thank GOD.

Re: Re[2]: Oracle vs Mysql

2004-01-20 Thread Carel-Jan Engel
At 03:29 PM 1/20/2004, you wrote: I do indeed. Rumor was that rpt/rpf was written by Larry himself. Now I understand! I once applied for a job at Oracle, and got asked: What do you think about RPT/RPF. My answer: Probably som hobby-project of one or another developer, which, after demonstration