RE: Shared server model

2001-06-12 Thread Rao, Maheswara
Raj, Your bosses idea might be OK with the following conditions. 1. If your database size is small (what is small is relative term. I consider a database small if it is less than 200 GB) 2. If the number of users accessing the database is less (around 50 users). 3. If you have big server

RE: Shared server model

2001-06-12 Thread Boivin, Patrice J
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 10:10 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject:RE: Shared server model Raj, Your bosses idea might be OK with the following conditions. 1. If your database size is small

RE: Shared server model

2001-06-12 Thread Kevin Kostyszyn
PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 10:10 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject:RE: Shared server model Raj, Your bosses idea might be OK with the following conditions. 1. If your database size is small (what is small

RE: Shared server model

2001-06-12 Thread Christopher Spence
: Rao, Maheswara [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 10:10 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject:RE: Shared server model Raj, Your bosses idea might be OK with the following conditions. 1. If your database

RE: Shared server model

2001-06-12 Thread Christopher Spence
Just a comment. I am not a NT fan, and dispise using it for Oracle. But I will repeat something I said many times. For the $10,000-$20,000 budget, I can make an NT server out perform any unix box on similar budget. NT's problem is NOT that it is slow, I beg to differ, it can hold up with most

RE: Shared server model

2001-06-12 Thread Paul Drake
same box running SuSE 7.1? :) (or your favorite distribution) Paul -Original Message- Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 12:41 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Just a comment. I am not a NT fan, and dispise using it for Oracle. But I will repeat something I said many times.

RE: Shared server model

2001-06-12 Thread Kevin Kostyszyn
O my, Christopher is the MAN -Original Message- Spence Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 12:41 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Just a comment. I am not a NT fan, and dispise using it for Oracle. But I will repeat something I said many times. For the $10,000-$20,000

RE: Shared server model

2001-06-12 Thread Richard Ji
I was gonna say that, but you beat me to it. :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/12/01 02:01PM same box running SuSE 7.1? :) (or your favorite distribution) Paul -Original Message- Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 12:41 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Just a comment. I am not a NT