To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: CHITALE Hemant Krishnarao/IT/CHRT/ST Group)
Subject: RE: adpatch question
Bambi,
I wouldn't touch *anything* under the hood as far as Apps goes, esp. 11i.
Raise a TAR and let Oracle Support come back to you on this. I assume that
you are testing the upgrade and not actually doing it. These sort of things
should have been ironed out prior to the upgrade with lots of
John --
Thanks for the email back. Apps suck, and going under the hood is not for
the weak of stomach. Of course, I'm not... and, at this point, fighting a
fire is more fun than watching a heap of smoldering ashes. So, I did it. I
went under the hood, and found that the fnd_install_processes
Title: RE: adpatch question
If he's not interested, I am. Please post a summary
upon completion.
Matt
Matt Adams - GE Appliances - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Discussing a black rectangle silhouetted on a martian landscape
That is the top of the calibration target,
that is NOT in fact
Title: RE: adpatch question
Matt (and any others who are interested) -
My adpatch went
fine after tinkering under the hood except for one place where Oracle created a
table, populated it and blew away its max extents. Amusing, but lame. I can't speak for Oracle on this
one
/ST Group)
Subject: RE: adpatch question
