:comp.oracle.databases.server vs ORACLE-L: deathmatch
I have to say that the newsgroup comp.oracle.databases.server is
much
more NT Friendly.
(IOUG: Did anything happen from IOUG concerning the ORACLE-NT-L
mailing
list?)
Not just Jonathan Lewis, but Sybrand Baker, Howard
I just tried c.d.o.* (example news:comp.databases.oracle.server )
with Netscape 4.75, and threading works fine as far as I can tell.
Based on what is stored of those newsgroups here (only goes back
about 1 or 2 weeks), I didn't see any huge amount of spam.
regards,
ep
On 14 May 2001, at 7:56,
Eric D. Pierce wrote:
As far as the Culture of any Oracle-NT-L, I can see the possible
advantage of having some weighty expert personalities involved. The
culture, and therefore utility, of an email list community is
almost always enhanced when the list is created with a good core
group of
I have to say that the newsgroup comp.oracle.databases.server is much
more NT Friendly.
(IOUG: Did anything happen from IOUG concerning the ORACLE-NT-L mailing
list?)
Not just Jonathan Lewis, but Sybrand Baker, Howard Rodgers, Ricky
Sanchez put out some pretty good stuff.
I'd post to the
Hi,
Paul Drake schrieb:
I have to say that the newsgroup comp.oracle.databases.server is much
more NT Friendly.
(IOUG: Did anything happen from IOUG concerning the ORACLE-NT-L mailing
list?)
Not just Jonathan Lewis, but Sybrand Baker, Howard Rodgers, Ricky
Sanchez put out some pretty
]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: comp.oracle.databases.server vs ORACLE-L: deathmatch
Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 23:40:20 -0800
I have to say that the newsgroup comp.oracle.databases.server is much
more NT Friendly.
(IOUG: Did anything happen from IOUG concerning
: Thursday, May 10, 2001 10:35 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:Re: comp.oracle.databases.server vs ORACLE-L:
deathmatch
Ah but is there as much humor there? Not really quibbling, I was
on
comp.oracle.databases.server for a long
10, 2001 10:35 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:Re: comp.oracle.databases.server vs ORACLE-L:
deathmatch
Ah but is there as much humor there? Not really quibbling, I was
on
comp.oracle.databases.server for a long time
Paul,
I haven't look at newsgroup c.o.d.s. for a long time, basically
because I got out of the habit of looking at newsgroups, the
messaging formatting and software needed seems a little unnatural
(convoluted) compared to email. But, I'll admit to laziness. I have
enough on my hands just
: comp.oracle.databases.server vs ORACLE-L: deathmatch
||
||
|| Paul,
||
|| I haven't look at newsgroup c.o.d.s. for a long time, basically
|| because I got out of the habit of looking at newsgroups, the
|| messaging formatting and software needed seems a little unnatural
|| (convoluted) compared
PROTECTED]]
|| Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 1:56 PM
|| To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
|| Subject: Re: comp.oracle.databases.server vs
ORACLE-L: deathmatch
||
||
|| Paul,
||
|| I haven't look at newsgroup c.o.d.s. for a long
time, basically
|| because I got out of the habit
: comp.oracle.databases.server vs
|| ORACLE-L: deathmatch
||
||
|| Ross,
||
|| You're so shy and reserved today... what gives? ;)
||
|| --- Mohan, Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|| I don't want anyone grabbing my content, thank you
|| very much.
||
|| Bunch a rat bastard, mind-maggoting
RE: comp.oracle.databases.server vs
|| ORACLE-L: deathmatch
||
||
||
|| Which do you suppose is Oracle's definition for the acronym
|| TAR? Terrain
|| Avoidance Radar? Threat Assessment Report??
||
|| http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?p=dictString=exact
|| Acronym=TAR
13 matches
Mail list logo
