So you got a performance improvement by
*disabling* DirectIO (ie, by setting _tru64_directio_disabled=TRUE) ?
Hemant K Chitale
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 30 May, 2002 3:48 AM
I joined in on this thread a little bit
Yes, I changed it from the default.
Jay Hostetter
Oracle DBA
D. E. Communications
Ephrata, PA USA
Hemant K Chitale [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/30/02 09:32AM
So you got a performance improvement by
*disabling* DirectIO (ie, by setting _tru64_directio_disabled=TRUE) ?
Hemant K Chitale
-
Quote from a person who has had researched this thoroughly at our site -
Oracle 8.1.6 and later releases check to see if they are running
on Tru64 5.0a or later operating system revision.If so, the RDBMS
automatically uses the directio mode to open the database files.
Directio bypasses the
I joined in on this thread a little bit late. I just did a little experimentation
with this parameter, and all that I can say is WOW! This is the equivalent of the
mythical _make_sql_run_faster!
My quick tests on 8.1.7.2 on both Tru64 5.1 pk3 and 5.1a pk1:
Query1 : Avg. of 1.13 sec improved
of _tru64_directio_disabled is FALSE ?
Qs What would be the SAFE Advisable to set _tru64_directio_disabled to
TRUE ?
Oracle 8.1.7.2 on Digital Tru64 Unix 5.1
It is a Banking (Hybrid) Application having a Load of about 2 Million OLTP
Transactions in a 5 Hour Window Everyday
--
Please see the official
for Direct IO support Disabled
Current Default Value of _tru64_directio_disabled is FALSE ?
Qs What would be the SAFE Advisable to set _tru64_directio_disabled to
TRUE ?
Oracle 8.1.7.2 on Digital Tru64 Unix 5.1
It is a Banking (Hybrid) Application having a Load of about 2 Million OLTP
Disabled
Current Default Value of _tru64_directio_disabled is FALSE ?
Qs What would be the SAFE Advisable to set _tru64_directio_disabled to
TRUE ?
Oracle 8.1.7.2 on Digital Tru64 Unix 5.1
It is a Banking (Hybrid) Application having a Load of about 2 Million OLTP
Transactions in a 5 Hour Window
?
Qs What would be the SAFE Advisable to set _tru64_directio_disabled to
TRUE ?
Oracle 8.1.7.2 on Digital Tru64 Unix 5.1
It is a Banking (Hybrid) Application having a Load of about 2 Million OLTP
Transactions in a 5 Hour Window Everyday
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http
?
Oracle 8.1.7.2 on Digital Tru64 Unix 5.1
It is a Banking (Hybrid) Application having a Load of about 2 Million OLTP
Transactions in a 5 Hour Window Everyday
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: VIVEK_SHARMA
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services
_tru64_directio_disabled Stands for Direct IO support Disabled
Current Default Value of _tru64_directio_disabled is FALSE ?
Qs What would be the SAFE Advisable to set _tru64_directio_disabled to TRUE ?
Oracle 8.1.7.2 on Digital Tru64 Unix 5.1
It is a Banking (Hybrid) Application having
Is 8.1.7.2.0 Supported/Safe/Advisable on Digital Tru64 Unix ver 5.1 ?
OR Should we Go to a Minimum of 8.1.7.2.1 ?
We are Migrating our Ver 7.3 Database
Thanks
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: VIVEK_SHARMA
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network
of _tru64_directio_disabled is FALSE ?
Qs What would be the SAFE Advisable to set _tru64_directio_disabled to
TRUE ?
Oracle 8.1.7.2 on Digital Tru64 Unix 5.1
It is a Banking (Hybrid) Application having a Load of about 2 Million OLTP
Transactions in a 5 Hour Window
Everyday
--
Please see
of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 26 May, 2002 11:28 PM
Is 8.1.7.2.0 Supported/Safe/Advisable on Digital Tru64 Unix ver 5.1 ?
OR Should we Go to a Minimum of 8.1.7.2.1 ?
We are Migrating our Ver 7.3 Database
Thanks
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
Lisa,
We are running Oracle 7.3.4 and 8.1.6 on Compaq
(Digital) Tru64 Unix. However, we are in the process of migrating
to Sun Solaris. I can try to answer your questions, though.
Lisa Koivu wrote:
Hello everyone,
Anyone out there running Oracle
on this flavor of Unix? If so can you please
Lisa,
73450 on 4.0f. that help? if so, call...(i think
you have the number?) if not, shoot me a mail.
Ross
-Original Message-
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: 6/1/2001 10:46 AM
Lisa,
We are running Oracle 7.3.4 and 8.1.6 on Compaq (Digital) Tru64
Unix. However
Title: digital tru64 unix
Hello everyone,
Anyone out there running Oracle on this flavor of Unix? If so can you please email me directly?
I don't have a Unix box to play with and I have a few simple performance questions. I'm also looking in the online doco and I don't see what I'm looking
16 matches
Mail list logo