RE: RE: RE: Siebel.

2001-11-30 Thread Linda . Miller-Coker


You'd almost have to be God to fix it.it consists of 1000s of tables.
It took me 2 weeks to reverse into Designer.  My customer is not welling to
pay for the time to fix the design.




"Mohan, Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@fatcity.com on 11/29/2001 04:17:58 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:


Dick,

question for yaif you "owned" Siebel, lock, stock and barrel,
what would you do?

1) Fix and switch ALL RI to the database ( oracle and ms and ibm and
others)
2) Just fix it where it is broken, but leave it in the app itself
3) leave it out but publish a tech spec document telling users/DBAs how
 and where to implement RI constraints.
4) something else.

I am curious how you would solve Tom Siebel's problem of shipping an app
across, say, four or five major different dbms platforms while
simultaneously
keeping bugs, development costs , requiring consulting and document costs
down,
and upgrade schedules and bug fixes in place.

In other words...if you were "god" how would you fix this problem you see?

curious,

Ross

-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:30 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Dennis,

You ought to be a sales droid!  That was a perfectly worded reply and
in
MANY instances I'll agree with you.  The ease or of lack thereof in
administering an application is very often decided on by damagement by
whether
or not they need a dedicated/specialized resource to handle it.  Therefore
sales
droids will constantly downplay that requirement, until the check is in
hand.
Actually sales droids downplay a lot of requirements for their software
until
the deal is in the bank.  Then they drop the bomb.  And then people like us
are
left to clean up.

Dick Goulet

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Mohan, Ross
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: RE: RE: Siebel.

2001-11-29 Thread Mohan, Ross

Dick, 

question for yaif you "owned" Siebel, lock, stock and barrel,
what would you do?

1) Fix and switch ALL RI to the database ( oracle and ms and ibm and others)
2) Just fix it where it is broken, but leave it in the app itself
3) leave it out but publish a tech spec document telling users/DBAs how
and where to implement RI constraints.
4) something else. 

I am curious how you would solve Tom Siebel's problem of shipping an app
across, say, four or five major different dbms platforms while
simultaneously
keeping bugs, development costs , requiring consulting and document costs
down, 
and upgrade schedules and bug fixes in place. 

In other words...if you were "god" how would you fix this problem you see?

curious, 

Ross

-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:30 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Dennis,

You ought to be a sales droid!  That was a perfectly worded reply and in
MANY instances I'll agree with you.  The ease or of lack thereof in
administering an application is very often decided on by damagement by
whether
or not they need a dedicated/specialized resource to handle it.  Therefore
sales
droids will constantly downplay that requirement, until the check is in
hand. 
Actually sales droids downplay a lot of requirements for their software
until
the deal is in the bank.  Then they drop the bomb.  And then people like us
are
left to clean up.

Dick Goulet

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Mohan, Ross
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: RE: Siebel.

2001-11-29 Thread Henry Poras

Dennis, 
Maybe I'm naive, or I'm giving too much credit to those making the purchase,
but I feel that for applications the size and cost of most ERPs you could
market them using features such as stability and data integrity along with
the bells and whistles. A cleaner schema would also make it easier for
companies to integrate the product into their other apps, saving $$. Maybe
radical steps don't go with sales and marketing. 

Henry

-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:55 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Henry - The issue isn't the major RDBMS vendors, although there can be
interesting variations among them when it comes to how RI is implemented.
Most successful ERP packages have been around for a number of years, so they
have had to be available on many platforms. On some of those platforms the
popular database alternative might not have RI. 
Another aspect from the vendor's point of view is being able to
create a package that will work at many, many sites and not require many
support calls, especially not require an experienced DBA. While in fact, as
you and I know, a serious package on Oracle should be supported by an
experienced DBA, when you are in a competitive sales situation, success is
spelled by "don't give the customer a reason not to buy our product." If the
customer doesn't have a DBA and they get the idea your package requires a
good DBA and your competitor is giving out hints that their package doesn't,
then the customer might just do something stupid and buy from your
competitor.
I'll give you an example of this. I don't know anything about Oracle
Applications (honest!). However, somebody told me that when it is installed,
no indexes are created. If true, that means that a DBA will need to figure
out the most common access paths for my site and create indexes. As an
ignorant purchaser, I could easily conclude that Oracle Applications were
difficult to administer.
I fully realize that from the point of view of the experienced DBA
there are a lot of reasons why life would be better if the idiot vendor
would implement RI, or many other things. I am just saying that the picture
looks different from the vendor's point of view, and the minuses probably
outweigh the plusses, and certainly for an existing product it must be
weighed against other development priorities. And if you decide to add it,
then you must figure a way to allow all existing customers to upgrade
without causing them a lot of problems and generating a lot of complaints.
Oh well, that is probably more than you wanted to know.
Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:01 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Just curious, but which of the major RDBMSs don't have RI?

Henry

-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:55 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Another factor is that when RI was first introduced, people tended to
overuse it and then performance was bad. I don't think this is such a
problem today, but I think many ERP packages were either developed before RI
was common to all SQL databases, or were discouraged by the initial
problems. But I agree that the main factor has been that they try to be
compatible with all databases and the easiest way is to maintain their own
data dictionary and not implement RI in the database. 
Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Henry Poras
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538

RE: RE: Siebel.

2001-11-29 Thread Weaver, Walt

Damn. I've been wracking my brain all day trying to figure out how to say
this.

Thanks, Dennis.

--Walt Weaver
  Bozeman, Montana

-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:55 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Henry - The issue isn't the major RDBMS vendors, although there can be
interesting variations among them when it comes to how RI is implemented.
Most successful ERP packages have been around for a number of years, so they
have had to be available on many platforms. On some of those platforms the
popular database alternative might not have RI. 
Another aspect from the vendor's point of view is being able to
create a package that will work at many, many sites and not require many
support calls, especially not require an experienced DBA. While in fact, as
you and I know, a serious package on Oracle should be supported by an
experienced DBA, when you are in a competitive sales situation, success is
spelled by "don't give the customer a reason not to buy our product." If the
customer doesn't have a DBA and they get the idea your package requires a
good DBA and your competitor is giving out hints that their package doesn't,
then the customer might just do something stupid and buy from your
competitor.
I'll give you an example of this. I don't know anything about Oracle
Applications (honest!). However, somebody told me that when it is installed,
no indexes are created. If true, that means that a DBA will need to figure
out the most common access paths for my site and create indexes. As an
ignorant purchaser, I could easily conclude that Oracle Applications were
difficult to administer.
I fully realize that from the point of view of the experienced DBA
there are a lot of reasons why life would be better if the idiot vendor
would implement RI, or many other things. I am just saying that the picture
looks different from the vendor's point of view, and the minuses probably
outweigh the plusses, and certainly for an existing product it must be
weighed against other development priorities. And if you decide to add it,
then you must figure a way to allow all existing customers to upgrade
without causing them a lot of problems and generating a lot of complaints.
Oh well, that is probably more than you wanted to know.
Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:01 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Just curious, but which of the major RDBMSs don't have RI?

Henry

-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:55 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Another factor is that when RI was first introduced, people tended to
overuse it and then performance was bad. I don't think this is such a
problem today, but I think many ERP packages were either developed before RI
was common to all SQL databases, or were discouraged by the initial
problems. But I agree that the main factor has been that they try to be
compatible with all databases and the easiest way is to maintain their own
data dictionary and not implement RI in the database. 
Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Henry Poras
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a li

RE: RE: Siebel.

2001-11-29 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS

Henry - The issue isn't the major RDBMS vendors, although there can be
interesting variations among them when it comes to how RI is implemented.
Most successful ERP packages have been around for a number of years, so they
have had to be available on many platforms. On some of those platforms the
popular database alternative might not have RI. 
Another aspect from the vendor's point of view is being able to
create a package that will work at many, many sites and not require many
support calls, especially not require an experienced DBA. While in fact, as
you and I know, a serious package on Oracle should be supported by an
experienced DBA, when you are in a competitive sales situation, success is
spelled by "don't give the customer a reason not to buy our product." If the
customer doesn't have a DBA and they get the idea your package requires a
good DBA and your competitor is giving out hints that their package doesn't,
then the customer might just do something stupid and buy from your
competitor.
I'll give you an example of this. I don't know anything about Oracle
Applications (honest!). However, somebody told me that when it is installed,
no indexes are created. If true, that means that a DBA will need to figure
out the most common access paths for my site and create indexes. As an
ignorant purchaser, I could easily conclude that Oracle Applications were
difficult to administer.
I fully realize that from the point of view of the experienced DBA
there are a lot of reasons why life would be better if the idiot vendor
would implement RI, or many other things. I am just saying that the picture
looks different from the vendor's point of view, and the minuses probably
outweigh the plusses, and certainly for an existing product it must be
weighed against other development priorities. And if you decide to add it,
then you must figure a way to allow all existing customers to upgrade
without causing them a lot of problems and generating a lot of complaints.
Oh well, that is probably more than you wanted to know.
Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:01 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Just curious, but which of the major RDBMSs don't have RI?

Henry

-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:55 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Another factor is that when RI was first introduced, people tended to
overuse it and then performance was bad. I don't think this is such a
problem today, but I think many ERP packages were either developed before RI
was common to all SQL databases, or were discouraged by the initial
problems. But I agree that the main factor has been that they try to be
compatible with all databases and the easiest way is to maintain their own
data dictionary and not implement RI in the database. 
Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Henry Poras
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: RE: Siebel.

2001-11-29 Thread Mark Leith

Another good one is when they change the application from flat files to an
RDBMS.. And then continue to forget all about relational database theory..

Love it!!

-Original Message-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 November 2001 14:50
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Henry,

I am sorry to have to admit it, but my experience with third party
software
is that all of them don't want to imbed their referential integrity into the
database.  I like you also believe it is because they do not have any kind
of
data model, never mind a 'proper' one Although the reason I was recently
given
was that it was "proprietary information of a confidential nature".  Smells
like
BS, looks like BS, care to taste it??

We've bothered PeopleSoft for theirs as we have to write some software
to
interface our Automated line to them.  They did finally come up with one,
but it
is dead wrong.  The model they came up with had tables missing, other tables
were on the model, but there was no definition of them in the database, and
the
data integrity on the model did not match the data in the database.  Mostly
we
found that foreign keys are not being completely enforced, and that primary
keys
are not exactly always unique.  One place where I will give on this type of
issue is when, for whatever reason, they populate tables in reverse order
namely
the children before the parents.  This I mostly see in massive batch
processing.

Dick Goulet

Reply Separator
Author: Henry Poras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:   11/28/2001 11:45 AM

Does anybody else get the same feeling as me that it is not that vendors are
ignoring proper data models, they don't even know what they are.

Henry

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:14 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Unfortunately it's the case way too often. Even at the enlightened place
where I work, our RI is done at the application level.

Not much I can do about it. Our development is done on MySQL and then
"ported" to Oracle.

--Walt Weaver
  Bozeman, Montana, USA

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:55 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L




BAH!! These bloody application providers leaving the integrity to their
bloody applications instead of leaving it in it's rightful place in the
database!!! Makes my life 10 times harder!!! Got no consideration at all
have they?



:P

Thanks!

Mark

-Original Message-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 November 2001 17:46
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



We use Siebel and no it does NOT have RI.




"Mark Leith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@fatcity.com on 11/28/2001 10:56:07 AM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:


Hi Gang,

Does anybody use Siebel - I believe it's a CRM package?

I'm trying to find out of the Siebel application enforces RI within the
database or the application? Anybody know?

Cheers

Mark

===
 Mark Leith | T: +44 (0)1905 330 281
 Sales & Marketing  | F: +44 (0)870 127 5283
 Cool Tools UK Ltd  | E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
   http://www.cool-tools.co.uk
   Maximising throughput & performance


--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Mark Leith
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author:
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Mark Leith
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself 

RE: RE: Siebel.

2001-11-29 Thread Henry Poras

Just curious, but which of the major RDBMSs don't have RI?

Henry

-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:55 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Another factor is that when RI was first introduced, people tended to
overuse it and then performance was bad. I don't think this is such a
problem today, but I think many ERP packages were either developed before RI
was common to all SQL databases, or were discouraged by the initial
problems. But I agree that the main factor has been that they try to be
compatible with all databases and the easiest way is to maintain their own
data dictionary and not implement RI in the database. 
Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Henry Poras
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: RE: Siebel.

2001-11-29 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS

Another factor is that when RI was first introduced, people tended to
overuse it and then performance was bad. I don't think this is such a
problem today, but I think many ERP packages were either developed before RI
was common to all SQL databases, or were discouraged by the initial
problems. But I agree that the main factor has been that they try to be
compatible with all databases and the easiest way is to maintain their own
data dictionary and not implement RI in the database. 
Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).