To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Cc:
Subject: RE: Database Health Template-OT
Shibu
I agree with Ryan, that in a technical sense this is bogus. But I
also
feel there is a grain of truth in it. Often at its core the question
has
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Cc:
Subject: RE: Database Health Template-OT
Hi Shibu-
Can we share your template so as to be able to fill in the gaps, and
also get
an idea of what you think a healthy DB should be like
...
Shibu
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 11/19/2003 7:35 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Cc:
Subject: Re: Database Health Template-OT
these are bogus
always ... always start with requirement ... have _them_ tell you what _they_ need.
This is entirely different than what you can provide.
Raj
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com
All Views expressed in this
Just FWIW - I set up dozens of alerts on our systems, monitoring conformance
to corporate standards. So, naming standards, presence / absence of
triggers, responsibility assignements in metadata, access privs consistent
with those assignements etc etc.
For every alert test, there will be a
Paula
We are working with OEM that come with Oracle 9.0.1
(upgrade to 9.2.0.4 if the next week - hopefully).
We are working with the repository with no problems.
I defined a query that collect tablespace size and % free.
I just now used the OEM to display a chart and prepare HTML report of this
Hi Shibu-
Can we share your template so as to be able to fill in the gaps, and also get
an idea of what you think a healthy DB should be like?
CSW Simon.
-Original Message-
Shibu MB
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 4:50 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hi all,
these are bogus. its just about giving your boss some BS, so he goes away. Been there,
done that.
the only useful stuff to send him would be polling the alert log for 'ORA' errors,
checking for chained rows as a percentage of total rows, and check to see how much
free space is in each
Shibu
I agree with Ryan, that in a technical sense this is bogus. But I also
feel there is a grain of truth in it. Often at its core the question has to
do with comfort, and if recent incidents have caused a loss of comfort, then
you get some sharp questions to answer. My strategy would be to
Guys,
For management reporting has anyone considered OEM V9?? Has anyone installed it - do
you know that it provides a number of reports already defined that can be setup to be
run periodically and available on the web - all with the installation of the OEM V9?
I was thinking this would
[EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled on the wall in glitter crayon:
Guys,
For management reporting has anyone considered OEM V9?? Has anyone
installed it - do you know that it provides a number of reports
already defined that can be setup to be run periodically and
available on the web - all with
I did using OEM Version 2 something on 8i databases. Multiple agents - got it running
- agent management was rather a pain in the ##$$%%% I agree. Still I am thinking this
new version with its bells and whistles might be better.
-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003
12 matches
Mail list logo
