K. Barrett writes:
So, no input on whether Laelias root before bloom or after bloom?
Just today I was looking at new roots on a young (not big enough to bloom yet) Laelia tenebrosa (if its still considered a Laelia, and not a Cattleya), appearing as the new growth is about 1/3 mature. And new
Oliver Sparrow writes:
"Here is a picture of an orchid found growing at 1500m in Pampa Hermosa, near
Satipo in PerĂº. http://www.trekperu.org/orchid.jpg
I would dearly like to know what it is - even the genus! The flowers are as
illustrated, around 12 cm across. The plant stands around 3-5m tall,
From: "Andy Easton" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OGD] Reply to Dennis.
Andy wrote: "... Although I have been accused of hating all
taxonomists, I actually see where they have some value in the orchid world
as long as they don't take themselves too seriously. Many posters on this
list help to
Peter Croezen wrote:
Flower looks like Sobralia macrantha.
Many thanks - I'll go with that.
It was growing with some delicate snow white Sobralias, clinging to rocks. These
had the standard reed stem, about 80 cm long, and alternate rounded red-brown
leaves about 7 cm along its length. Flowers
Hi Oliver,
Your Peruvian species may be Epistephium duckei Huber rather than a
Sobralia.
Cheers,
Gary
Gary Yong Gee Roger Sawkins
Phone 61 (0)7 3398 4222
PO Box 57, Cannon Hill Qld 4170 Australia
http://www.yonggee.name
I did a search on the Sobralias annotated for Peru (it is so nice to have
the advance search feature in the Kew Monocot Checklist) and I got the
following names listed. So it seems that Sobralia macrantha cannot be the
plant in question. According to the Kew list, this is the geographical
In a message dated 6/2/05 10:50:52 PM, Robert Bedard writes:
The other clones of Be Tris 'Ching Hua #3' that I have, have never produced a peloric flower. This clone is a pretty stable peloric.
You are having a problem with the term clone. Be Tris 'Ching Hua #3' is a clone. Everything with that
Oliver,
The orchid pictured is an Epistephium, perhaps E.
hernandii. The flowers of the dozen or so species in the genus are all similar.
Your guess as to whether it might be Vanilla was a good one, as Dressler places
the genus in the subtribe, Vanillinae. Unlike Vanilla, Epistephium does
Peter, I recently had cause to question the currenly accepted name for what was known as Aerides fieldingii. I e-mailed the Registrar at the RHS and his reply was the " Roseum" was the accepted name in use at the RHS. Julian went into detail about masculine feminine, neuter? etc . The upshot is
Dear Oliver
I am not an expert, but the description of the leaf suggests to me
the genus Epistephium. The flower certainly does resemble a Sobralia.
I would peruse the web page by Nina Rach, possibly contact her for her
opinion. http://www.autrevie.com/Sobralia/
Another good person to
Here is a picture of an orchid found growing at 1500m in Pampa Hermosa, near
Satipo in PerĂº. http://www.trekperu.org/orchid.jpg
I would dearly like to know what it is - even the genus! The flowers
are as illustrated, around 12 cm across. The plant stands around 3-5m
tall, winding through
Dennis is correct. Eric Christenson ad Dave Bennett
are the ones who
will be able to identify the Sobralia.
I was thinking of Sobralia altissima, which I believe grows at a much higher
elevation than 1500 meters, where Oliver's' was found growing. However, I must
say that I did seea
Thanks Iris, you are right (although splitting hairs) over my incorrect
use of the word clones when I clearly meant plants. (That is what I
get for typing too fast, while thinking about something else.)
If you don't believe that I understand Orchid Nomenclature, you are free
to visit this
Again, Nina Rach comes to the rescue. http://sobralia.autrevie
com/Epistephium_TheGenus.html
It has some pictures.
Jose
___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:18:29 -0400
From: Andy Easton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OGD] Well done Guido!
I guess I did give you the lead in for that shot at Kew. Fair enough too,
though I think we should allow for someone to learn taxonomy after their
earlier forays into other
Hi Roy.
That's what Phil Cribb told me several years ago, so I dutifully
changed all my Aerides name-endings to the neuter form. However, Phil
never told me why Aerides is neuter (and I had no reason to ask), so,
in the wake of Pandelis' son of revelation, I'm hoping someone will
provide
16 matches
Mail list logo