In a message dated 9/20/04 6:19:15 AM, Michael writes: > Furthermore, for this to work there can be no surprises, if a > word is unexpected it will be alomost (was that a typo or on purpose?) > indecipherable. > Who would of thought my area of study would be relevant here. > True. Your last sentence is perfectly understandable, since the error of substituting "would of" for the correct "would have" is quite common, hence not surprising. I won't get into the issue of run-on sentences, because I don't know where you live. Back to ochrids. Iris
_______________________________________________ the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids
