Re: [ORG-discuss] IP Bill - the HUBS amendment

Is Liberty and or the Law Society working on those parallel reconstruction arguments? C > William Waites > 4 May 2016 at 15:31 > To follow this up, this amendment was debated yesterday (p. 679 > [1]). Apart from a technical point, the Minister for Security was >

Re: [ORG-discuss] IP Bill - the HUBS amendment

To follow this up, this amendment was debated yesterday (p. 679 [1]). Apart from a technical point, the Minister for Security was worried that it would have unintended consequences: that criminals would seek out small providers to avoid surveillance. This argument is of course specious. There are