-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 19/01/2016 16:07, Sam Hogarth wrote: > > It is worth noting, perhaps, that Section 189 orders should be > made assessing technical feasibility and financial costs associated > with complying with the orders, and there is a process for appeal. > Unless I'm missing something, there is a mechanism for push-back > within the bounds of the Bill. The question remains on how > effective this will be in practice.
With regards to review and appeals - it all depends on trust. If you trust the government and future governments to respect that review process, then on a technical level you may view this as a sensible approach. If you assume - as I think most of us do - the government may be considered a hostile actor from a threat modelling perspective then it's not a very useful component in the bill from a threat minimisation perspective. - -- Cheers, James Harrison -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWnmC7AAoJENTyYHL8dmp9Wa0P/0AGtBmZmuyiWMuXoffl03E2 sJC0USEdulR2QrbLYWXpVSdUVS77iRcU+nrVM3GMcbbhkiGRrOq6mfU5xjNGdUQX ZUEE0WPwwl+/+LIdjg1mHPbSQA03CvKbUzBHKO8U0AzMdiSqcF8aa4QOZ+8RZL7n ckUFKsyEpAJTv8PLmj8srIVwZG6rrVu3mcPQY0MsRH44ZbHzAKnx2b+fcLWH6XdJ /F0mz3zDDZPiO5UTn4iH0XG7f3xBplgjlsHkL3/qx0ym7+eQVtSF3Paf418nU8yV uX6MR4ZG/qmYBtUYVTbvPEyfPRVJTYkKi19If8kDc4NK7dLync5dNwra3Fr4SS30 HJUfT3luZky4u5AefBZY6or3dadfGBOOeTL/5Jzx2f+YxqVskv5lAaVD0ZiARh9l UKCHhbIB++693kwkDgD+zIBcAXDyIxyqrj8ohwpNOl//xmhdffKyueP2Rae6k8qV Lx7qWJfl/CufKVLGfnqcolenZM2uBMMinFQjtQ2CWiltkZajyYuBtVC0lokGqL/s QCphQILJHKY6Jhc1DRsj6l8BGRMc5rvADrrd/ViDYELgCPfx08CVVzWFj9FUVt8a uxkdZ03hY1rbo5P1yDmK/uQeAmO1eQhMT9xl72Y6vUfmU5J3uq1Y/5Ie51gf8PDh /0F6KgUYMYk9udXGpAhs =fGsm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Please support ORG's work - join and help fund our future: https://www.openrightsgroup.org/join To unsubscribe, send a blank email to org-discuss-le...@lists.openrightsgroup.org or use https://lists.openrightsgroup.org/listinfo/org-discuss
