Understood, and I am sorry if my tone seemed harsh. It seems that "on the day
of the dance" may be the best compromise between giving a little lead time in
case a substitute performer must be found, and keeping the testing reasonable
current.
Some of the Greenfield series do not allow for
Fascinating and valuable discussion. Our policy requires the test for
any unmasked talent to be completed immediately before they enter the
hall, on the principle that anyone with a low enough virus load to pass
a rapid test is unlikely to pose a risk to the dancers. This adds a
dimension we
Liz, that makes perfect sense in retrospect. However, many venues do not
require testing for folks who remain masked and have had a "test in to
unmask" approach for performers while on stage (where they were masked
elsewhere and, until receiving a negative result, on stage as well).
Greenfield's
I've seen policies of "test on arrival, keep your N95 on until your test
resolves" in a lot of places, and I think they're often a reasonable
tradeoff: it means your test is as current as possible, an N95 is very
effective, and the chance of a positive is low.
If the rule was "everyone tested and
I would have thought that anyone testing before attending or performing at a
dance would determine that their test was actually negative before entering the
hall and potentially exposing people. Liz Sturgen
Sent from the all new AOL app for Android
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 9:46 PM, Don
